Cited by 71Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Clinician recognition of anxiety disorders in depressed outpatients

Zimmerman, Mark, Chelminski, Iwona·2003·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

The recognition of anxiety disorders in depressed patients has potential clinical significance because their presence predicts poorer outcome and may influence treatment selection. In routine clinical settings, an unstructured diagnostic interview is typically used to assess patients at the initiation of treatment. Unstructured interviews, however, may result in missed diagnoses, with potential negative clinical consequences. The goals of the present study were to examine whether anxiety disorders are less frequently identified using a routine unstructured clinical evaluation than a semi-structured diagnostic interview in patients with a principal diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), and to determine patients' desire for treatment for comorbid anxiety disorders. Psychiatric outpatients with MDD were evaluated with either a semi-structured or an unstructured diagnostic interview. Current DSM-IV anxiety disorder diagnoses were compared in the two, nonoverlapping, groups of depressed psychiatric outpatients seen in the same practice setting. Patients with comorbid anxiety disorders who were interviewed with the semi-structured interview were asked if they wanted treatment to address their anxiety symptoms. Individuals interviewed with the semi-structured interview were diagnosed with significantly more current anxiety disorders than individuals who were assessed with an unstructured interview. There was variability in patients' desire for treatment of the different anxi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3956(03)00020-7

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmerman, M., & Chelminski, I.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Zimmerman, Mark
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
325-333
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974384999
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29mh048732-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-56404, MH48732)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, comorbidities, under-recognition, psychiatric outpatients, treatment preferences
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review