CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological aspects of weight maintenance and relapse in obesity

Byrne, Susan M·2002·Journal of Psychosomatic Research
DOI 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00487-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Studies have shown that, among formerly obese individuals, the continued practice of the behavioural strategies adopted during weight loss is associated with the successful maintenance of a new lower weight. Much less attention has been focused on the psychological factors that motivate the continued use or abandonment of these critical weight maintenance behaviours. This paper reviews studies that have attempted to identify psychological characteristics that may be associated with weight maintenance and relapse in obesity. This is important because a better understanding of these factors may lead to the development of improved psychological treatments for obesity. The results of the studies suggest that a number psychological factors, such as having unrealistic weight goals, poor coping or problem-solving skills and low self-efficacy, may have an important effect on the behaviours involved in weight maintenance and relapse in obesity, and further research in this area is warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00487-7

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kramer, 1989, Long-term follow-up of behavioural treatment for obesity: patterns of weight gain among men and women, Int J Obes, 13, 124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–135 of 135

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Byrne, S. M.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Byrne, Susan M
ORCID
Byrne, Susan M
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
1029-1036
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00487-7
OpenAlex
W2077016894
Cited by
135
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity, weight maintenance, relapse, psychological factors, coping strategies, problem-solving skills, self-efficacy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Goals, Humans, Obesity, Problem Solving, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review