Cited by 797Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceDigital Marketing and Social Media

An online prepurchase intentions model

Shim, Soyeon, Eastlick, Mary Ann, Lotz, Sherry L, Warrington, Patricia·2001·Journal of Retailing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00051-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shim, S., Eastlick, M. A., Lotz, S. L., & Warrington, P.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Shim, Soyeon
Venue
Journal of Retailing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
397-416
ISSN
0022-4359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086838148
Cited by
797
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 44
FWCI
51.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Retailing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • International Council of Shopping Centers Educational Foundation
  • Academy of Marketing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
online purchase intention, search goods, web search, perceived behavioral control, online shopping, consumer behavior, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review