Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic nodal dissection in the intrathoracic staging of patients with non–small cell lung cancer

Open access
Graham, Alastair N.J., Chan, K.John M., Pastorino, Ugo, Goldstraw, Peter·1999·The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Although systematic nodal dissection is accepted as an important component of the intrathoracic staging of disease in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung cancer, many surgeons still do not routinely perform it. We reviewed our practice to assess the information provided by its routine application even when lymph node metastases are considered unlikely. METHODS The records of 240 patients undergoing thoracotomy for clinically staged cT1-3 N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer were reviewed. In 5 cases (2%) mediastinal dissection was not performed because of specific contraindications and in 8 cases (3%) exploratory thoracotomy was performed. The pathologic findings in the 227 patients who underwent pulmonary resection with systematic nodal dissection were analyzed. RESULTS The median number of nodal stations, including N1 and N2, examined and submitted separately for histologic assessment was 7 per patient (range 3-13). N2 disease was disclosed in 46 patients overall (20%), including 41 of the 227 patients undergoing pulmonary resection (18%) and 5 of those undergoing exploratory thoracotomy (62.5%). No subgroup had a 0% incidence of N2 metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age, increasing tumor size, left lower lobe origin, and bronchial origin were significant independent variables for prediction of lymph node metastases at the N1 level, the N2 level, or both. CONCLUSIONS Because no clinical or pathologic subset of patients with a negligible incidence of N2 disease could be discriminated, systematic nodal dissection must be routinely employed for accurate intrathoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70419-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Graham, A. N. J., Chan, K. J. M., Pastorino, U., & Goldstraw, P.
Venue
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
246-251
ISSN
0022-5223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999488778
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic nodal dissection in the intrathoracic staging of patients with non–small cell lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70419-8
The paper
Graham, A. N. J., Chan, K. J. M., Pastorino, U., & Goldstraw, P. (1999). Systematic nodal dissection in the intrathoracic staging of patients with non–small cell lung cancer. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70419-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.