The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ANATOMICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URETHRA AND CLITORIS
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated the anatomical relationship between the urethra and the surrounding erectile tissue, and reviewed the appropriateness of the current nomenclature used to describe this anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed dissection was performed on 2 fresh and 8 fixed human female adult cadavers (age range 22 to 88 years). The relationship of the urethra to the surrounding erectile tissue was ascertained in each specimen, and the erectile tissue arrangement was determined and compared to standard anatomical descriptions. Nerves supplying the erectile tissue were carefully preserved and their relationship to the soft tissues and bony pelvis was noted. RESULTS: The female urethra, distal vaginal wall and erectile tissue are packed into the perineum caudal (superficial) to the pubic arch, which is bounded laterally by the ischiopubic rami, and superficially by the labia minora and majora. This complex is not flat against the rami as is commonly depicted but projects from the bony landmarks for 3 to 6 cm. The perineal urethra is embedded in the anterior vaginal wall and is surrounded by erectile tissue in all directions except posteriorly where it relates to the vaginal wall. The bulbs of the vestibule are inappropriately named as they directly relate to the other clitoral components and the urethra. Their association with the vestibule is inconsistent and, thus, we recommend that these structures be renamed the bulbs of the clitoris. CONCLUSIONS: A series of detailed dissections suggest that current anatomical descriptions of female human urethral and genital anatomy are inaccurate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight Into Etiology and Prevention
Walsh, P. C., & Donker, P. J. (1982) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53012-8 · Cited by 1,439
Priapism of the Clitoris: A Case Report Following Trazodone Use
Pescatori, E., Engelman, J. C., Davis, G., et al. (1993) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36450-9 · Cited by 60
Cited by
The female sexual response: a different model
Basson, R. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278641 · Cited by 995
Minto, C. L., Liao, L.-M., Woodhouse, C. R., Ransley, P. G., & Creighton, S. M. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12980-7 · Cited by 320
O'CONNELL, H. E., SANJEEVAN, K. V., & HUTSON, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000173639.38898.cd · Cited by 313
Self-citationMeyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. (2002) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0621-8_12 · Cited by 60
Behavioral Therapies for Treating Female Sexual Dysfunctions: A State-of-the-Art Review
Mestre-Bach, G., Blycker, G. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11102794 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- O'CONNELL, H. E., HUTSON, J. M., ANDERSON, C. R., & PLENTER, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1892-1897
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2040551284
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANATOMICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URETHRA AND CLITORIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63188-4
- The paper
- O'CONNELL, H. E., HUTSON, J. M., ANDERSON, C. R., & PLENTER, R. J. (1998). ANATOMICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URETHRA AND CLITORIS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63188-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.