The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MONITORING RENAL CRYOSURGERY: PREDICTORS OF TISSUE NECROSIS IN SWINE
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine parameters for monitoring renal cryosurgery and correlate with histopathologic necrosis in a porcine model. Parameters include: 1) tissue temperature, 2) distance of tissue from the cryosurgical probe insertion site, and 3) inclusion of tissue by the visible iceball. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following midline incision, 6 healthy kidneys from 3 domestic pigs were treated using a nitrogen-based cryosurgical system with 3.4 mm outer diameter cryoprobe. Temperatures were monitored at 6 sites in each kidney using prototype thermocouples. Gross and histologic analysis was performed on tissue harvested from each thermosensor site 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: All animals survived to complete the full protocol. Post-procedure bleeding was managed surgically. Histopathology revealed that complete ablation was uniformly produced at temperatures of -19.4C or lower in 13/13 tissue samples. Within 16 mm. of the probe insertion site, cells were uniformly ablated in 17/17 samples while degree of tissue death varied widely beyond this margin. Cell death was more likely found at points encompassed by the visible iceball (16/18, 89%) than those beyond it (2/18, 11%) [p <0.0001, Chi-square] while 2/18 (11%) of samples harvested from within the iceball margin were partially viable. CONCLUSIONS: Temperature monitoring using thermocouples during porcine renal cryosurgery demonstrated complete homogeneous necrosis of tissues reaching -19.4C or lower. Distance beyond 16 mm. from the cryoprobe and direct visualization of the iceball proved to be less reliable predictors of tissue necrosis. Management of bleeding post-thaw was necessary in every case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cryobiology of cryosurgical injury
Hoffmann, N. E., & Bischof, J. C. (2002) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01683-7 · Cited by 592
Experimental cryosurgery investigations in vivo
Gage, A. A., Baust, J. M., & Baust, J. G. (2009) · Cryobiology · doi:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.10.001 · Cited by 292
Comparison of cryotherapy and nephrectomy in treating implanted VX‐2 carcinoma in rabbit kidneys
Nakada, S. Y., Jerde, T. J., Warner, T., & Lee, F. T. (2004) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05015.x · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CHOSY, S. G., NAKADA, S. Y., LEE, F. T., & WARNER, T. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1370-1374
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2065425204
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MONITORING RENAL CRYOSURGERY: PREDICTORS OF TISSUE NECROSIS IN SWINE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63618-8
- The paper
- CHOSY, S. G., NAKADA, S. Y., LEE, F. T., & WARNER, T. F. (1998). MONITORING RENAL CRYOSURGERY: PREDICTORS OF TISSUE NECROSIS IN SWINE. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63618-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.