Cited by 14Renal cell carcinoma treatmentBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsVeterinary Oncology Research

Comparison of cryotherapy and nephrectomy in treating implanted VX‐2 carcinoma in rabbit kidneys

Nakada, Stephen Y., Jerde, Travis J., Warner, Thomas, Lee, Fred T.·2004·BJU International

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of cryoablation and radical nephrectomy for treating implanted VX‐2 carcinoma in rabbit kidneys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot study was conducted using 27 New Zealand white rabbits to assess the natural history of VX‐2 carcinoma in the kidney. VX‐2 tumour segments (1 mm 3 ) were excised from subcutaneous tumours in carrier rabbits and implanted in the left kidney of study rabbits. The tumours were allowed to grow for 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 18, 21 and 28 days after implantation. Tumour progression was analysed in the kidney and surrounding serosa, and metastatic tumour presence in the lung, liver, spleen and bladder determined. After this, 80 rabbits were implanted with VX‐2 in the lower pole and randomized into one of three groups: group 1, 35 rabbits treated 7 days after VX‐2 implantation with cryoablation using a 15‐min double‐freeze technique and a 5‐mm tumour margin target temperature of − 20 °C; group 2, 35 rabbits treated with open radical nephrectomy; or group 3, 10 untreated controls. Rabbits were maintained for 22 days and then killed; the kidneys, lungs, liver, spleen, urinary bladder and ureter were removed, and examined grossly and histologically for tumour presence. RESULTS: In the pilot study there was a consistent 50–100 mm 3 tumour after 7 days of growth, with no evidence of metastatic disease. By day 10 the mean kidney tumour was 230 mm 3 and two of three rabbits had metastases in the lung. By day 18 the mean primary tumour was 5504 mm 3 and all rabbits had metastatic disease. In the comparison study, cryotherapy cured 66% of implanted rabbits while nephrectomy cured 64%. All untreated controls had significant local and metastatic tumours. Findings in animals killed at 15 days after treatment showed significant differences between both treatment groups and untreated controls ( P < 0.002). There was no difference in disease‐free survival between the cryotherapy and open nephrectomy groups ( P = 0.78) CONCLUSION: Both cryoablation and radical nephrectomy were effective in treating implanted VX‐2 renal tumours compared with untreated controls. There was no statistically significant difference between cryoablation and nephrectomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05015.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakada, S. Y., Jerde, T. J., Warner, T., & Lee, F. T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Nakada, Stephen Y.
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-25
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
632-636
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
OpenAlex
W1987530508
Cited by
14
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Veterinary Oncology Research
Keywords
VX2 tumor, cryoablation, radical nephrectomy, renal cell carcinoma, kidney tumours, tumor growth, metastasis, lung metastasis, disease-free survival, rabbit model, treatment efficacy comparison, tumor recurrence
MeSH terms
Animals, Cryosurgery, Kidney Neoplasms, Neoplasm Transplantation, Nephrectomy, Pilot Projects, Rabbits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review