The DOI matches its Crossref record.
URETERAL STONES CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI
Abstract
PURPOSE: The American Urological Association convened the Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding available methods for treating ureteral calculi and to make practice policy recommendations based on the treatment outcomes data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel searched the MEDLINE data base for all articles related to ureteral calculi published from 1966 to January 1996. Outcomes data were extracted from articles accepted after panel review. The data were then meta-analyzed to produce outcome estimates for alternative treatments of ureteral calculi. RESULTS: The data indicate that up to 98% of stones less than 0.5 cm. in diameter, especially in the distal ureter, will pass spontaneously. Shock wave lithotripsy is recommended as first line treatment for most patients with stones 1 cm. or less in the proximal ureter. Shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy are acceptable treatment choices for stones 1 cm. or less in the distal ureter. CONCLUSIONS: Most ureteral stones will pass spontaneously. Those that do not can be removed by either shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy. Traditional blind basket extraction, without fluoroscopic control and guide wires, is not recommended. Open surgery is appropriate as a salvage procedure or in certain unusual circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assimos, D., Krambeck, A., Miller, N. L., Monga, M., Murad, M. H., Nelson, C. P., Pace, K. T., Pais, V. M., Pearle, M. S., Preminger, G. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationHumes, H. D., Weitzel, W. F., Bartlett, R. H., Swaniker, F. C., Paganini, E. P., Luderer, J. R., & Sobota, J. (2004) · Kidney International · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00923.x · Cited by 256
Verde, P. E., & Ohmann, C. (2015) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1122 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Segura, J. W., Preminger, G. M., Assimos, D. G., Dretler, S. P., Kahn, R. I., Lingeman, J. E., & Macaluso, J. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1915-1921
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2012529271
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: URETERAL STONES CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9
- The paper
- Segura, J. W., Preminger, G. M., Assimos, D. G., Dretler, S. P., Kahn, R. I., Lingeman, J. E., & Macaluso, J. N. (1997). URETERAL STONES CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.