Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE

GUILLONNEAU, BERTRAND, ROZET, FRANÇOIS, CATHELINEAU, XAVIER, LAY, FRANK, BARRET, ERIC, DOUBLET, JEAN-DOMINIQUE, BAUMERT, HERVÉ, VALLANCIEN, GUY·2002·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the morbidity, and minor and major complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgical team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 28, 1998 and February 28, 2001, 567 patients 42 to 77 years old (mean age plus or minus standard deviation 63.5 +/- 6) with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, including 458 (80.6%), without lymphadenectomy. Mean body mass index was 25.3 +/- 2.9 (range 17.3 to 37.5). American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 1 to 3 in 65%, 27% and 8% of cases, respectively. A total of 12 patients (2.1%) had undergone intra-abdominal surgery below the mesocolon and 40 had undergone urological surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded as well as all complications and their severity score within the initial 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 105 complications were observed in 97 patients (17.1%), including 21 major (3.7%) and 83 minor (14.6%) complications. Of the patients 21 (3.7%) underwent reoperation for a postoperative complication, including 10 (1.76%) who required an intensive care unit stay. Seven cases (1.2%) were converted to conventional retropubic radical prostatectomy. Mean blood loss was 380 +/- 195 ml. and the overall transfusion rate was 4.9%. In 2 patients (0.3%) deep vein thrombosis was associated with another surgical complication but not with pulmonary embolism. Urological, bowel and hemorrhagic complications represented 66.6%, 16.2% and 7.6% (total 89.4%) of all complications, and 20%, 33.3% and 33.3% of all repeat interventions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was performed according to the defined protocol with no complications in 82.9% of patients. The morbidity of this approach compares favorably with that of retropubic surgery. Growing experience and knowledge sharing concerning the prevention and early management of these complications would make possible a further decrease in the morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65381-5

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
GUILLONNEAU, B., ROZET, F., CATHELINEAU, X., LAY, F., BARRET, E., DOUBLET, J.-D., BAUMERT, H., & VALLANCIEN, G.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2002-01
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
51-56
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2083175860
Cited by
344
References
12
FWCI
26.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65381-5
The paper
GUILLONNEAU, B., ROZET, F., CATHELINEAU, X., LAY, F., BARRET, E., DOUBLET, J.-D., BAUMERT, H., & VALLANCIEN, G. (2002). PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65381-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.