The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NEOADJUVANT ANDROGEN ABLATION BEFORE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN cT2bNxMo PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR RESULTS
Abstract
PURPOSE: In the initial report of the Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group patients who received 3 months of androgen deprivation had a significant decrease in the positive margin rate. We monitored these patients for 5 years and to our knowledge present the longest followup of any neoadjuvant trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional prospective randomized trial was performed between February 1992 and April 1994 involving patients with stage cT2b prostate cancer, including 138 who received 3 months of leuprolide plus flutamide before radical prostatectomy and 144 who underwent radical prostatectomy only. Patients were followed every 6 months with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for 5 years. Biochemical recurrence was defined as PSA greater than 0.4 ng./ml. RESULTS: At 5 years there was no difference in the biochemical recurrence rate. PSA was less than 0.4 ng./ml. in 64.8% of the patients in the neoadjuvant androgen ablation plus prostatectomy and 67.6% in the prostatectomy only group (p = 0.663). CONCLUSIONS: Although 3 months of androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy resulted in an apparently significant decrease in positive surgical margins, a 5-year followup does not indicate any difference in the recurrence rate. Until studies document improvement in biochemical or clinical recurrence with longer periods of treatment, induction androgen deprivation before radical prostatectomy is not indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
D’Amico, A. V., Moul, J., Carroll, P. R., Sun, L., Lubeck, D., & Chen, M.-H. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.01.075 · Cited by 455
The Current State of Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
Hellerstedt, B. A., & Pienta, K. J. (2002) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.52.3.154 · Cited by 386
Taplin, M.-E., Montgomery, B., Logothetis, C. J., Bubley, G. J., Richie, J. P., Dalkin, B. L., Sanda, M. G., Davis, J. W., Loda, M., True, L. D., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.53.4578 · Cited by 284
Alibhai, S. M. H., Gogov, S., & Allibhai, Z. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.06.006 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- SOLOWAY, M. S., PAREEK, K., SHARIFI, R., WAJSMAN, Z., McLEOD, D., WOOD, D. P., PURAS-BAEZ, A., & THE LUPRON DEPOT NEOADJUVANT PROSTATE CANCER STUDY GROUP†
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-116
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2037610329
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEOADJUVANT ANDROGEN ABLATION BEFORE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN cT2bNxMo PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR RESULTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65393-1
- The paper
- SOLOWAY, M. S., PAREEK, K., SHARIFI, R., WAJSMAN, Z., McLEOD, D., WOOD, D. P., PURAS-BAEZ, A., & THE LUPRON DEPOT NEOADJUVANT PROSTATE CANCER STUDY GROUP†. (2002). NEOADJUVANT ANDROGEN ABLATION BEFORE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN cT2bNxMo PROSTATE CANCER: 5-YEAR RESULTS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65393-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.