The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BICALUTAMIDE MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH CASTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONMETASTATIC LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: 6.3 YEARS OF FOLLOWUP
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Nonsteroidal antiandrogen monotherapy may be a treatment option for some patients with advanced prostate cancer. We report a survival and safety update from an analysis of 2 studies in which patients with nonmetastatic (M0) locally advanced disease were treated with either 150 mg. bicalutamide monotherapy or castration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 2 open label, multicenter studies of identical design were pooled according to protocol. Patients with stage T3/4 prostate cancer were randomized to receive 150 mg. bicalutamide daily or castration (orchiectomy or 3.6 mg. goserelin acetate every 28 days) in a 2:1 ratio. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were randomized to treatment. After a median followup of 6.3 years mortality was 56%. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in overall survival (hazard ratio 1.05, upper 1-sided 95% confidence limit 1.31, p = 0.70) or time to progression (1.20, 1.45, p = 0.11). There were statistically significant benefits in the bicalutamide monotherapy group in the 2 quality of life parameters of sexual interest (p = 0.029) and physical capacity (p = 0.046). The highest incidences of adverse events were the pharmacological side effects of hot flashes in the castration group, and breast pain and gynecomastia in the bicalutamide group. The incidences of other types of adverse events were low. Bicalutamide was well tolerated, with few drug related withdrawals from study, and no new safety issues were identified during this longer followup. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with 150 mg. bicalutamide is an attractive alternative to castration in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer for whom immediate hormone therapy is indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2005.08.007 · Cited by 759
Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: Current status and future prospects
Miyamoto, H., Messing, E. M., & Chang, C. (2004) · The Prostate · doi:10.1002/pros.20115 · Cited by 317
Hofman, K., Liu, N., & Manolikakes, G. (2018) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201705470 · Cited by 283
Alibhai, S. M. H., Gogov, S., & Allibhai, Z. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.06.006 · Cited by 173
Boccardo, F., Rubagotti, A., Battaglia, M., Di Tonno, P., Selvaggi, F. P., Conti, G., Comeri, G., Bertaccini, A., Martorana, G., Galassi, P., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.12.013 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- IVERSEN, P., TYRRELL, C. J., KAISARY, A. V., ANDERSON, J. B., VAN POPPEL, H., TAMMELA, T. L. J., CHAMBERLAIN, M., CARROLL, K., & MELEZINEK, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1579-1582
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2073336624
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BICALUTAMIDE MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH CASTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONMETASTATIC LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: 6.3 YEARS OF FOLLOWUP. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67032-2
- The paper
- IVERSEN, P., TYRRELL, C. J., KAISARY, A. V., ANDERSON, J. B., VAN POPPEL, H., TAMMELA, T. L. J., CHAMBERLAIN, M., CARROLL, K., & MELEZINEK, I. (2000). BICALUTAMIDE MONOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH CASTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONMETASTATIC LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: 6.3 YEARS OF FOLLOWUP. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67032-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.