Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN: A DECADE OF DISCOVERY-WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND WHERE WE ARE GOING

POLASCIK, THOMAS J., OESTERLING, JOSEPH E., PARTIN, ALAN W.·1999·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many advances have occurred during the last decade in the clinical use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) for detecting, staging and monitoring prostate cancer. We review the clinical usefulness and limitations of serum PSA as a tumor marker of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English language literature was reviewed with respect to the major contributions and limitations of PSA in present clinical practice. RESULTS: Although controversial, age specific PSA reference ranges can improve the sensitivity for prostate cancer detection in young men and the specificity in older men. Percent free PSA improves the specificity for prostate cancer detection in men with PSA values between 4 and 10 ng./ml., and a PSA density of greater than 0.15 may better distinguish benign prostatic hyperplasia from prostate cancer. PSA velocity can improve the ability to detect prostate cancer when 3 serial PSA values are measured during a 2-year period. For prostate cancer staging PSA is most useful combined with clinical stage and Gleason score in multivariate analysis. Percent free PSA may prove useful for staging prostate cancer but further clinical trials are needed to determine its clinical usefulness. PSA is the most clinically useful means to monitor disease recurrence after treatment of prostate cancer. With ultrasensitive PSA assays it is now possible to increase the lead time for detection of disease recurrence by several months. CONCLUSIONS: During the last decade much of the focus has been on improving the ability of this tumor marker to detect prostate cancer. PSA remains the best and most widely used tumor marker in urology today.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68543-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
POLASCIK, T. J., OESTERLING, J. E., & PARTIN, A. W.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1999-08
Volume
162
Issue
2
Pages
293-306
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2086878322
Cited by
599
References
1
FWCI
31.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN: A DECADE OF DISCOVERY-WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND WHERE WE ARE GOING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68543-6
The paper
POLASCIK, T. J., OESTERLING, J. E., & PARTIN, A. W. (1999). PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN: A DECADE OF DISCOVERY-WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND WHERE WE ARE GOING. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68543-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.