The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer
Open accessAbstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in American men, and a more aggressive form of the disease is particularly prevalent among African Americans. The therapeutic success rate for prostate cancer can be tremendously improved if the disease is diagnosed early. Thus, a successful therapy for this disease depends heavily on the clinical indicators (biomarkers) for early detection of the presence and progression of the disease, as well as the prediction after the clinical intervention. However, the current clinical biomarkers for prostate cancer are not ideal as there remains a lack of reliable biomarkers that can specifically distinguish between those patients who should be treated adequately to stop the aggressive form of the disease and those who should avoid overtreatment of the indolent form.A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. A biomarker reveals further information to presently existing clinical and pathological analysis. It facilitates screening and detecting the cancer, monitoring the progression of the disease, and predicting the prognosis and survival after clinical intervention. A biomarker can also be used to evaluate the process of drug development, and, optimally, to improve the efficacy and safety of cancer treatment by enabling physicians to tailor treatment for individual patients. The form of the prostate cancer biomarkers can vary from metabolites and chemical products present in body fluid to genes and proteins in the prostate tissues.Current advances in molecular techniques have provided new tools facilitating the discovery of new biomarkers for prostate cancer. These emerging biomarkers will be beneficial and critical in developing new and clinically reliable indicators that will have a high specificity for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. The purpose of this review is to examine the current status of prostate cancer biomarkers, with special emphasis on emerging markers, by evaluating their diagnostic and prognostic potentials. Both genes and proteins that reveal loss, mutation, or variation in expression between normal prostate and cancerous prostate tissues will be covered in this article. Along with the discovery of prostate cancer biomarkers, we will describe the criteria used when selecting potential biomarkers for further development towards clinical use. In addition, we will address how to appraise and validate candidate markers for prostate cancer and some relevant issues involved in these processes. We will also discuss the new concept of the biomarkers, existing challenges, and perspectives of biomarker development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valadi, H., Ekström, K., Bossios, A., Sjöstrand, M., Lee, J. J., & Lötvall, J. O. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1596 · Cited by 12,834
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Ries, L. A. G., Harkins, D., Krapcho, M. F., Mariotto, A. B., Miller, B., Feuer, E. J., Clegg, L. X., Eisner, M. P., Horner, M., Howlader, N., et al. (2006) · Digital Archive @ GSU · Cited by 11,403
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework
(2001) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.113989 · Cited by 6,762
The Ki-67 protein: From the known and the unknown
Scholzen, T., & Gerdes, J. (2000) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4652(200003)182:3<311::aid-jcp1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 4,646
Gerdes, J., Lemke, H., Baisch, H., Wacker, H. H., Schwab, U., & Stein, H. (1984) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.133.4.1710 · Cited by 4,173
Greenlee, R. T., Murray, T., Bolden, S., & Wingo, P. A. (2000) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.50.1.7 · Cited by 3,850
Recurrent Fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS Transcription Factor Genes in Prostate Cancer
Tomlins, S. A., Rhodes, D. R., Perner, S., Dhanasekaran, S. M., Mehra, R., Sun, X.-W., Varambally, S., Cao, X., Tchinda, J., Kuefer, R., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117679 · Cited by 3,846
Hayes, J. D., & Pulford, D. J. (1995) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239509083491 · Cited by 3,464
Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical Prostatectomy
Pound, C. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.17.1591 · Cited by 3,071
Cited by
Metelli, A., Wu, B. X., Riesenberg, B., Guglietta, S., Huck, J. D., Mills, C., Li, A., Rachidi, S., Krieg, C., Rubinstein, M. P., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aay4860 · Cited by 139
Capone, F., Guerriero, E., Sorice, A., Colonna, G., Ciliberto, G., & Costantini, S. (2016) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/2016/3064643 · Cited by 38
Jeihooni, A. K., Kashfi, S. M., Hatami, M., Avand, A., & Bazrafshan, M.-R. (2019) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-017-1282-8 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Madu, C. O., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Ivyspring International Publisher
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 150-177
- ISSN
- 1837-9664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022240786
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 176
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7150/jca.1.150
- The paper
- Madu, C. O., & Lu, Y. (2010). Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.1.150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.