The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advanced Bladder Cancer (Stages pT3b, pT4a, pN1 and pN2): Improved Survival after Radical Cystectomy and 3 Adjuvant Cycles of Chemotherapy. Results of a Controlled Prospective Study
Abstract
A total of 49 bladder cancer patients with tumor stages pT3b, pT4a and/or pelvic lymph node involvement without microscopic or macroscopic evidence of residual tumor was randomized into 2 comparative groups: the chemotherapy group was to receive 3 adjuvant cycles of methotrexate, vinblastine and cisplatin plus doxorubicin (M-VAC) or epirubicin (M-VEC) after radical cystectomy. The control group received no additional treatment. The protocol was activated in May 1987. Patient recruitment was concluded in December 1990 because an interim analysis of the 49 randomized patients revealed a significant prognostic advantage in favor of 26 patients randomized to the chemotherapy group compared to 23 in the control group (p = 0.0015, log rank test for relapse-free survival curves). Of the 26 patients randomized for adjuvant chemotherapy 18 were treated with M-VAC or M-VEC (3 cycles in 16 patients and 2 cycles in 2). Of the remaining 8 patients 7 refused chemotherapy before or during cycle 1 and 1 received chemotherapy without cisplatin because of impaired renal function. An update of the patients in August 1991 revealed a further increase in the prognostic difference between the 2 trial arms (p = 0.0012). Of 18 patients who received treatment with M-VAC or M-VEC only 3 have had tumor progression to date compared to 18 of 23 patients in the control group. Further statistical analysis of the data was performed on the basis of Cox's regression model, incorporating various criteria as explanatory variables, including patient sex and age, pT stage and number of involved lymph nodes. This multivariate analysis revealed a significant decrease in the risk of tumor recurrence (p = 0.0007, 2-sided) after adjuvant chemotherapy. The number of lymph nodes involved was also of prognostic significance (p = 0.0028, 1-sided). The results indicate that the survival time after radical cystectomy can be prolonged considerably by adjuvant polychemotherapy in cases of locally advanced bladder carcinoma. Fortunately, all of these conclusions are not affected by switching from an intent-to-treat analysis to an analysis of the therapy actually performed. The p values obtained from the latter are 0.0005 (log rank test) and 0.0001 (Cox model with the same set of additional regressors).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leissner, J., Hohenfellner, R., Thüroff, J. W., & Wolf, H. K. (2000) · BJU International · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00614.x · Cited by 444
Self-citationPlosker, G. L., & Faulds, D. (1993) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199345050-00011 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Stöckle, M., Meyenburg, W., Wellek, S., Voges, G., Gertenbach, U., Thüroff, J. W., Huber, C., & Hohenfellner, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2 Part 1
- Pages
- 302-306
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1439606022
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advanced Bladder Cancer (Stages pT3b, pT4a, pN1 and pN2): Improved Survival after Radical Cystectomy and 3 Adjuvant Cycles of Chemotherapy. Results of a Controlled Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36578-3
- The paper
- Stöckle, M., Meyenburg, W., Wellek, S., Voges, G., Gertenbach, U., Thüroff, J. W., Huber, C., & Hohenfellner, R. (1992). Advanced Bladder Cancer (Stages pT3b, pT4a, pN1 and pN2): Improved Survival after Radical Cystectomy and 3 Adjuvant Cycles of Chemotherapy. Results of a Controlled Prospective Study. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36578-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.