Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis

Open access
Leissner, J., Hohenfellner, R., Thüroff, J.W., Wolf, H.K.·2000·BJU International

Abstract

Objective To determine the need to standardize the number and location of lymph nodes to be removed during radical cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder carcinoma. Patients and methods The pelvic lymph nodes from 447 patients (mean age 62.8 years) who underwent radical cystectomy between 1986 and 1997 were evaluated. The number of lymph nodes was correlated with the depth of invasion of the primary tumour (pT), occurrence of nodal metastases, clinical outcome, the operating surgeons and the pathologists dissecting the nodes. Results The clinical follow‐up was available for 302 patients (mean follow‐up 38.7 months). The mean (range) number of lymph nodes removed was 14.7 (1–46). The number of lymph nodes removed varied significantly among different surgeons but not among pathologists. In pT3 and pT4 tumours, a more extended lymphadenectomy ( 16 lymph nodes) correlated with a higher percentage of patients with documented nodal metastases. There was a significant correlation between the number of lymph nodes removed and the tumour‐free 5‐year survival in patients with pT1, pT2 or pT3 tumours, and in patients with 1–5 positive lymph nodes ( P < 0.01). Conclusion Extensive lymphadenectomy significantly improves the prognosis of patients with invasive bladder cancer and represents a potentially curative procedure in patients with nodal metastases, including micrometastases that may escape detection during routine histopathological evaluation. The results indicate the need for a standardized lymph node dissection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00614.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Metadata

Authors
Leissner, J., Hohenfellner, R., Thüroff, J. W., & Wolf, H. K.
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
85
Issue
7
Pages
817-823
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
OpenAlex
W1547477410
Cited by
444
References
9
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00614.x
The paper
Leissner, J., Hohenfellner, R., Thüroff, J. W., & Wolf, H. K. (2000). Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00614.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.