The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen as Pre-Screening Test for Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Prostate cancer has become the most common cancer and the second cause of death due to cancer in men in North America. Since curative therapies are limited to early stages of the disease, the availability of an efficient, easy to perform, widely acceptable and cost-effective method of early detection of prostate cancer is particularly important. Thus, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate as well as measurements of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) were performed independently in a series of 1,002 men between 45 and 80 years old randomly selected from the electoral rolls of Quebec City and its vicinity as part of a screening program for prostate cancer. Using this population of randomly chosen men, various cutoff serum PSA values were selected in an attempt to find the optimal decision threshold that would indicate a much greater risk of having prostatic cancer. At a threshold value of 3.0 micrograms./l. the sensitivity and specificity of the test are 80.7 and 89.6%, respectively, while the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve reflecting the accuracy of the test is 87.8 +/- 3.3% (plus or minus standard deviation). Moreover, the negative predictive value was estimated at 98.6%, thus leaving only a 1.4% chance of missing cancer when the serum PSA value was 3.0 micrograms./l. or less. Most importantly, such a threshold level of serum PSA retains only 19% of the whole cohort as candidates for transrectal ultrasonography and expensive diagnostic procedures, thus leading to the finding of 1 prostate cancer of 4 such examinations. The present data indicate that simple measurement of serum PSA can be used efficiently as a pre-screening test for prostate cancer in the general population to identify, at a low cost, the subpopulation of men at a much greater risk of having prostate cancer, and who should then be submitted to the more elaborate and expensive diagnostic procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic Carcinoma
Crawford, E. D., Eisenberger, M. A., McLeod, D. G., Spaulding, J. T., Benson, R., Dorr, F. A., Blumenstein, B. A., Davis, M. A., & Goodman, P. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198908173210702 · Cited by 1,464
Cited by
Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer
Madu, C. O., & Lu, Y. (2010) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.1.150 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Labrie, F., Dupont, A., Suburu, R., Cusan, L., Tremblay, M., Gomez, J.-L., & Emond, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3 Part 2
- Pages
- 846-851
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1455378812
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum Prostate Specific Antigen as Pre-Screening Test for Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37402-5
- The paper
- Labrie, F., Dupont, A., Suburu, R., Cusan, L., Tremblay, M., Gomez, J.-L., & Emond, J. (1992). Serum Prostate Specific Antigen as Pre-Screening Test for Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37402-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.