The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Natural History of Peyronie’s Disease
Abstract
The natural history of Peyronie's disease was evaluated in 97 men by means of a questionnaire. Disease duration ranged from 3 months to 8 years. Questions addressed pain, bending, ability for intercourse, over-all effect of the disease, psychological effects, treatments received and degree of disease progression. Approximately 40% of the patients found pain, bending, ability for intercourse and over-all effects to be unchanged during the course of the disease. Bending and ability for relations worsened in 40% of the patients during the same interval, while only 6% had worsening of pain. Of the patients 77% reported psychological effects due to Peyronie's disease, which improved in 28%, did not change in 36% and worsened in 36%. Over-all, 13% of the patients believed the disease to be one of gradual resolution, 47% believed there had been little or no change and 40% believed that the disease pattern was one of gradual progression. We found no statistically significant association between disease duration and spontaneous improvement in penile bending. A similar lack of statistical significance was found when improvement in a variety of categories was compared in patients who received no therapy versus those who received a variety of conventional medical therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Analysis of the Natural History of Peyronie’s Disease
Mulhall, J. P., Schiff, J., & Guhring, P. (2006) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(06)00270-9 · Cited by 417
Proposal: Trauma as the Cause of the Peyronie's Lesion
Devine, C. J. J., Somers, K. D., Jordan, G. H., & Schlossberg, S. M. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65361-8 · Cited by 381
The Chronology of Depression and Distress in Men with Peyronie's Disease
Nelson, C. J., Diblasio, C., Kendirci, M., Hellstrom, W., Guhring, P., & Mulhall, J. P. (2008) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00895.x · Cited by 255
El-Sakka, A. I., Hassoba, H. M., Pillarisetty, R. J., Dahiya, R., & Lue, T. F. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64223-x · Cited by 250
A SURGICAL ALGORITHM FOR THE TREATMENT OF PEYRONIE'S DISEASE
Levine, L. A., & Lenting, E. L. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68184-9 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelbard, M. K., Dorey, F., & James, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1376-1379
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1572089739
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Natural History of Peyronie’s Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39746-x
- The paper
- Gelbard, M. K., Dorey, F., & James, K. (1990). The Natural History of Peyronie’s Disease. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39746-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.