Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis

Hanno, Philip, Levin, Robert M., Monson, Frederick C., Teuscher, Cory, Zong Zhou, Zhao, Ruggieri, Michael, Whitmore, Kristene, Wein, Alan J.·1990·Journal of Urology

Abstract

We reviewed clinical and histological findings in 55 patients with interstitial cystitis and 21 with voiding dysfunction secondary to other pathological conditions. Of our interstitial cystitis patients 36% would fail to meet the research definition proposed at a recent National Institutes of Health workshop. Detrusor mastocytosis was present in 64% of our interstitial cystitis patients compared to 80% of the noninterstitial cystitis group. There was no statistically significant difference in mean detrusor mast cell counts between interstitial cystitis and noninterstitial cystitis patients. Biopsies of 12 patients who did meet the proposed National Institutes of Health research definition were evaluated by immunohistochemical techniques. Early results are inconclusive. These studies indicate that interstitial cystitis is a complex disease whose diagnosis presently still must be made from a symptom complex rather than from objective histological criteria, including mastocytosis or the presence of any specific immunoreactive cell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39933-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Hanno, P., Levin, R. M., Monson, F. C., Teuscher, C., Zong Zhou, Z., Ruggieri, M., Whitmore, K., & Wein, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1990-02
Volume
143
Issue
2
Pages
278-281
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2413286206
Cited by
209
References
0
FWCI
15.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39933-0
The paper
Hanno, P., Levin, R. M., Monson, F. C., Teuscher, C., Zong Zhou, Z., Ruggieri, M., Whitmore, K., & Wein, A. J. (1990). Diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39933-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.