Inhibition in recall with extralist “cues”
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The principle of cue overload suggests that plausible answers may later interfere with the final retrieval attempt instead of helping it.
“One mystery in this logic is that the principle of cue overload (Watkins 1975) suggests that these plausible answers may later interfere with the final retrieval attempt instead of helping it, and it is not entirely clear how these possible answers will facilitate recall.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Watkins 1975
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.93 · Cited by 1,696 · see citing works
A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience
Brown, A. S. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.204 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval.
Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996) · Memory · doi:10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50010-0 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning
McDermott, K. B. (2021) · Annual review of psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051019 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
- Authors
- Watkins, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Watkins, Michael J.
- Venue
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-303
- ISSN
- 0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996630399
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- inhibition, free recall, attention, retrieval mechanisms, word lists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
