Cited by 46Nosocomial Infections in ICUInfection Control in HealthcareIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

RISK FACTORS FOR NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA

Fleming, Catherine A., Balaguera, Henri U., Craven, Donald E.·2001·Medical Clinics of North America

Abstract

Despite an increased understanding of the pathogenesis of NP and advances in diagnosis and treatment, the risk, cost, morbidity, and mortality of NP remain unacceptably high. This article has identified strategic areas for primary and secondary prophylaxis that are simple and cost-effective. Realizing that the pathogenesis of NP requires bacterial colonization and the subsequent entry of these bacteria into the lower respiratory tree helps highlight the role of cross-infection and the importance of standard infection control procedures. Similarly the role of sedation and devices as risk factors can be reduced by minimizing the duration and intensity of sedation and length of exposure to invasive devices. Additional low-cost interventions that have been shown to be effective in preventing NP are the positioning of patients in a semirecumbent position and the appropriate use of enteral feeding, antibiotics, and selected medical devices. Prophylaxis of NP and VAP is carried out best by a multidisciplinary management team comprised of physicians (critical care, pulmonary medicine, infectious diseases, and primary care), critical care and infection control nurses, and respiratory therapists, even though this approach may result in decreased professional autonomy and freedom. This group should review the current guidelines, pathways, and standards for short-term and long-term prophylaxis of NP and VAP, then integrate them into and monitor their use for routine patient care. The ris…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70395-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disease prevention is the most effective form of healthcare because it protects people from illness, saves money, minimizes suffering, and improves quality of life.

    “Disease prevention is the most effective form of healthcare because it protects people from illness, and as a result, saves money, minimizes suffering and improves the quality of life of the American public ( 1-9 ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleming, C. A., Balaguera, H. U., & Craven, D. E.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Medical Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
1545-1563
ISSN
0025-7125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153557399
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
nosocomial pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia, risk factors, pneumonia prevention, infection control, cross-infection, sedation, invasive devices, enteral nutrition, multidisciplinary team, critical care nursing, respiratory care, Joint Commission accreditation, guideline implementation
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Critical Care, Cross Infection, Humans, Morbidity, Patient Care Team, Pneumonia, Posture, Primary Prevention, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Therapy, Risk Factors, United States, Infection Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review