Cited by 17Nosocomial Infections in ICUClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDysphagia Assessment and Management

Effect of metoclopramide on nosocomial pneumonia in patients with nasogastric feeding in the intensive care unit

Open access
Nassaji, M., Ghorbani, R., Frozeshfard, M., Mesbahian, F.·2010·Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal

Abstract

This study in the Islamic Republic of Iran aimed to determine whether metoclopramide can prevent nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). Of 220 patients admitted to the surgical ICU who had a nasogastric tube for more than 24 hours, 68 case patients received oral metoclopramide (10 mg every 8 hours) and 152 control patients did not. Similar proportions of cases and controls developed nosocomial pneumonia (33.8% versus 33.6%). Endotracheal intubation was a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia (odds ratio 7.70). There were no significant differences between groups in mortality rate or time of onset of nosocomial pneumonia. Metoclopramide appears to have no effect on the development of nosocomial pneumonia with nasogastric feeding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26719/2010.16.4.371

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis based on six studies finds a significant advantage to erythromycin for 24 to 48 hours, since it promotes gastric motility.

    “Our meta-analysis based on six studies finds a significant advantage to erythromycin and its use should be encouraged for 24 to 48 hours, since it promotes gastric motility, and if a large (> 500 mL) GRV still persists, the use of post-pyloric feeding should be considered over withholding EN, unless a new abdominal complication (obstruction, perforation, severe distension…) is suspected (see Meta-”

    From ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. (2019) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Introduction describes metoclopramide as a prokinetic agent, and the Discussion reports this study's findings on metoclopramide and nosocomial pneumonia. Searches for erythromycin, a six-study meta-analysis, and a 24–48-hour recommendation found no passage addressing those claims in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to a meta-analysis, prokinetic use is associated with a trend towards better enteral feeding tolerance (RR 0.65, CI 0.37, 1.14, p=0.14).

    “According to our meta-analysis (see Meta-analysis V in Supplemental Materials), prokinetic use is associated with a trend towards better enteral feeding tolerance (RR 0.65, CI 0.37, 1.14, p=0.14).”

    From ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. (2019) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Introduction describes metoclopramide as a prokinetic, but the Results report pneumonia and mortality outcomes, not enteral feeding tolerance. A search for feeding tolerance and the stated RR, CI, and p-value found no matching result in our copy. The citing sentence identifies the meta-analysis as the citing authors’ own, rather than this source paper’s. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]8. Ostendorf U, Ewig S, Torres A. Nosocomial pneumonia. 8. Cur- rent opinion in infectious diseases, 2006, 19:327-38.
  2. [11]11. Orr DA et al. Effects of omeperazole, with and without meto-- 12. clopramide, in elective obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 1993, 48:114-9.
  3. [17]17. Orozco Levi M et al. Semirecumbent position protects from 18. pulmonary aspiration but not from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. American journal of respira- tory and critical care medicine, 1995, 152:1387-90.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nassaji, M., Ghorbani, R., Frozeshfard, M., & Mesbahian, F.
Affiliations
Semnan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
371-374
ISSN
  • 1020-3397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-1634
OpenAlex
W1699419409
Cited by
17
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
metoclopramide, nosocomial pneumonia, nasogastric tube feeding, intensive care unit, endotracheal intubation, risk factors, mortality, pharmacological prophylaxis
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Antiemetics, Critical Care, Cross Infection, Double-Blind Method, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Intubation, Intratracheal, Iran, Male, Metoclopramide, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Incidence, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review