The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Determinant of High-Affinity Dofetilide Binding to HERG1 Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes: Involvement of S6 Sites
Abstract
This study reports that the affinity of HERG1 A for dofetilide is decreased from 0.125 +/- 0.003 microM for wild-type (WT) channels to 15 +/- 3 microM for F656V, a mutation in the COOH-terminal half of the S6. Similarly, the IC(50) for quinidine was increased from 8 +/- 4 microM for WT to 219 +/- 65 microM for the F656V mutation, whereas affinity for external tetraethylammonium was similar for WT (51 +/- 10 mM) and F656V (36 +/- 10 mM, NS). Kinetics of onset of inactivation of F656V was similar to WT but kinetics of deactivation, activation, and recovery from inactivation differed from WT. However, mutations in nearby amino acids in the S6 more strikingly altered deactivation, activation, and recovery from inactivation but had little effect on affinity for dofetilide. To assess the effects of disruption of inactivation, the S631A mutation was made. The S631A mutation altered the IC(50) for dofetilide to 20 +/- 3 microM, but the IC(50) for quinidine was unchanged at 8 +/- 4 microM for WT and 10 +/- 1 microM for S631A. To address whether the F656V mutation alters the IC(50) for dofetilide in a channel that does not inactivate, the double mutation S631A/F656V was made. The IC(50) for dofetilide of the double mutation was 32 +/- 3 microM, which is not substantially different than that of S631A. These data support the notion that allosteric changes occurring during the process of inactivation are necessary for high-affinity dofetilide binding. In conclusion, the Phe-656 residue of HERG is a molecular determinant of high-affinity dofetilide binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sudden death associated with short-QT syndrome linked to mutations in HERG
Brugada, R., Hong, K., Dumaine, R., Cordeiro, J., Gaita, F., Borggrefe, M., Menendez, T. M., Brugada, J., Pollevick, G. D., Wolpert, C., et al. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000109482.92774.3a · Cited by 847
hERG K+Channels: Structure, Function, and Clinical Significance
Vandenberg, J. I., Perry, M. D., Perrin, M. J., Mann, S. A., Ke, Y., & Hill, A. P. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00036.2011 · Cited by 696
H1‐antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti‐inflammatory actions and cardiac effects
Leurs, R., Church, M. K., & Taglialatela, M. (2002) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1046/j.0954-7894.2002.01314.x · Cited by 450
A Central Role of the BK Potassium Channel in Behavioral Responses to Ethanol in C. elegans
Davies, A. G., Pierce-Shimomura, J. T., Kim, H., VanHoven, M. K., Thiele, T. R., Bonci, A., Bargmann, C. I., & McIntire, S. L. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00979-6 · Cited by 357
Predicting drug–hERG channel interactions that cause acquired long QT syndrome
Sanguinetti, M. C., & Mitcheson, J. S. (2005) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2005.01.003 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Lees-Miller, J. P., Duan, Y., Teng, G. Q., & Duff, H. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 367-374
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169279691
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Determinant of High-Affinity Dofetilide Binding to HERG1 Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes: Involvement of S6 Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(24)23209-0
- The paper
- Lees-Miller, J. P., Duan, Y., Teng, G. Q., & Duff, H. J. (2000). Molecular Determinant of High-Affinity Dofetilide Binding to HERG1 Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes: Involvement of S6 Sites. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(24)23209-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.