The DOI matches its Crossref record.
H1‐antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti‐inflammatory actions and cardiac effects
Abstract
Summary: This review addresses novel concepts of histamine H 1‐receptor function and attempts to relate them to the anti‐inflammatory effects of H 1‐antihistamines. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiotoxic effects of H 1‐antihistamines are discussed. H 1‐receptors are G‐protein‐coupled‐receptors (GPCRs), the inactive and active conformations of which coexist in equilibrium. The degree receptor activation in the absence of histamine is its ‘constitutive activity’. In this two‐state model, histamine acts as an agonist by combining with and stabilizing the activated conformation of the H 1‐receptor to shift the equilibrium towards the activated state. Drugs classified previously as antagonists act as either inverse agonists or neutral antagonists. Inverse agonists combine with and stabilize the inactive conformation of the receptor to shift the equilibrium towards the inactive state. Thus, they may down‐regulate constitutive receptor activity, even in the absence of histamine. Neutral antagonists combine equally with both conformations of the receptor, do not affect basal receptor activity but do interfere with agonist binding. All H 1‐antihistamines examined to date are inverse agonists. As the term ‘H 1‐receptor antagonists’ is obviously erroneous, we suggest that it be replaced by ‘H 1‐antihistamines’. The observations that H 1‐receptors modulate NF‐κB activation and that there are complex interactions between GPCRs, has allowed us to postulate receptor dependent‐mechanisms for some anti‐inflammatory effects of H 1‐antihistamines, e.g. inhibition of ICAM‐1 expression and the effects of bradykinin. Finally, the finding that blockade of HERG1 K+ channels is the mechanism by which some H 1‐antihistamines may cause cardiac arrhythmias has allowed the development of preclinical tests to predict such activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008*
Bousquet, J., Khaltaev, N., Cruz, A. A., Denburg, J., Fokkens, W. J., Togias, A., Zuberbier, T., Baena‐Cagnani, C. E., Canonica, G. W., Van Weel, C., et al. (2008) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01620.x · Cited by 4,729
Simons, F. E. R. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra033121 · Cited by 697
Thomson, N. C., Chaudhuri, R., & Livingston, E. (2004) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00039004 · Cited by 555
Risk of first‐generation H 1 ‐antihistamines: a GA 2 LEN position paper
Church, M. K., Maurer, M., Simons, F. E. R., Bindslev‐Jensen, C., Van Cauwenberge, P., Bousquet, J., Holgate, S. T., & Zuberbier, T. (2010) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02325.x · Cited by 440
Self-citationKolkhir, P., Giménez-Arnau, A. M., Kulthanan, K., Peter, J., Metz, M., & Maurer, M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00389-z · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Leurs, R., Church, M. K., & Taglialatela, M.
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 489-498
- ISSN
- 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2092104992
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: H1‐antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti‐inflammatory actions and cardiac effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0954-7894.2002.01314.x
- The paper
- Leurs, R., Church, M. K., & Taglialatela, M. (2002). H1‐antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti‐inflammatory actions and cardiac effects. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0954-7894.2002.01314.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.