The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and in vitro pharmacology of a selective gamma-aminobutyric acidC receptor antagonist.
Abstract
In mammals, receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are divided into three pharmacological classes, which are denoted GABAA, GABAB, and GABAC. GABAC receptors are defined by their insensitivity to the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline and the GABAB receptor agonist (-)-baclofen. GABAC receptors probably are a heterogeneous group of proteins. The most extensively studied mammalian GABAC receptors are those found in neurons of the outer retina. These receptors are GABA-gated Cl- channels comprised of p subunits, of which there are two subtypes. The physiological functions served by GABAC receptors are largely unknown; to determine the functions, it would be useful to have GABAC-selective ligands. In a previous study, we found that isoguvacine, a GABAA-selective agonist, and 3-aminopropyl-(methyl)phosphinic acid (3-APMPA), a GABAB-selective agonist, show affinity for retinal GABAC receptors. In particular, 3-APMPA is an antagonist with low micromolar potency (Kb approximately 1 microM). Here, we report the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA), a hybrid of isoguvacine and 3-APMPA designed to retain affinity for GABAC receptors but not to interact with GABAA or GABAB receptors. Electrical assays show that TPMPA is a competitive antagonist of cloned human mu 1 GABAC receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Kb approximately 2 microM). TPMPA is > 100-fold weaker as an inhibitor of rat brain GABAA receptors expressed in oocytes (Kb approximately 320 microM) and has only weak agonist activity on GABAB receptors assayed in rat hippocampal slices (EC50 approximately 500 microM). TPMPA should be a useful pharmacological probe with which to investigate GABAC receptor function in the outer retina and in any other areas of the nervous system in which these types of receptor are present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Amygdaloid Complex: Anatomy and Physiology
SAH, P., FABER, E. S. L., LOPEZ DE ARMENTIA, M., & POWER, J. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2003 · Cited by 1,745
Molecular Structure and Physiological Function of Chloride Channels
Jentsch, T. J., Stein, V., Weinreich, F., & Zdebik, A. A. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2001 · Cited by 1,256
The ABC of GABA receptors: a brief review
Chebib, M., & Johnston, G. A. R. (1999) · Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03151.x · Cited by 436
Olmos-Serrano, J. L., Paluszkiewicz, S. M., Martin, B. S., Kaufmann, W. E., Corbin, J. G., & Huntsman, M. M. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1714-10.2010 · Cited by 309
Inhibitory feedback shapes bipolar cell responses in the rabbit retina
Molnar, A., & Werblin, F. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00838.2007 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Ragozzino, D., Woodward, R. M., Murata, Y., Eusebi, F., Overman, L. E., & Miledi, R.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1024-1030
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326367729
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and in vitro pharmacology of a selective gamma-aminobutyric acidC receptor antagonist. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09406-4
- The paper
- Ragozzino, D., Woodward, R. M., Murata, Y., Eusebi, F., Overman, L. E., & Miledi, R. (1996). Design and in vitro pharmacology of a selective gamma-aminobutyric acidC receptor antagonist. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09406-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.