The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Block of the rat brain IIA sodium channel alpha subunit by the neuroprotective drug riluzole.
Abstract
The effects of riluzole, a novel neuroprotective drug with anticonvulsant and anti-ischemic properties, were studied on currents carried by cloned rat brain IIA sodium channel alpha subunits expressed in Xenopus oocytes. (i) When the oocytes were held at strongly hyperpolarized potentials to close the sodium channels and riluzole was added to the external solution, the current elicited by test depolarizing pulses was reduced within a few minutes and recovered upon washout of the riluzole. Although the currents were reduced, riluzole did not shift the peak current-voltage relationship. An inhibitory constant of 30 microM was estimated for the low affinity block of closed channels. (ii) Riluzole did not affect the time course of inactivation, and repetitive stimulation at frequencies that did not result in significant accumulation of inactivation did not affect current block. These results suggest that riluzole did not block open channels. (iii) Riluzole increased steady state inactivation by shifting its voltage dependence in the hyperpolarizing direction, by prolonging the recovery from inactivation, and by blocking more effectively at high stimulation frequencies. According to the modulated receptor theory, these results suggest that riluzole binds selectively to inactivated channels, with an inhibitory constant estimated at 0.2 microM. These results show that the riluzole binding site is on the alpha subunit of the sodium channel, and they suggest that stabilization of the inactivated state may underlie the neuroprotective properties of riluzole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dose-ranging study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Riluzole Study Group II, Lacomblez, L., Bensimon, G., Meininger, V, Leigh, P. N., & Guillet, P. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91680-3 · Cited by 1,301
Molecular Background of Leak K+Currents: Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channels
Enyedi, P., & Czirják, G. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2009 · Cited by 868
The Role of Excitotoxicity in Neurodegenerative Disease
Doble, A. (1999) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(98)00042-4 · Cited by 723
Bellingham, M. C. (2011) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00116.x · Cited by 388
Riluzole inhibits the persistent sodium current in mammalian CNS neurons
Urbani, A., & Belluzzi, O. (2000) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00242.x · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Hebert, T., Drapeau, P., Pradier, L., & Dunn, R. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1055-1060
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1924751878
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Block of the rat brain IIA sodium channel alpha subunit by the neuroprotective drug riluzole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10187-9
- The paper
- Hebert, T., Drapeau, P., Pradier, L., & Dunn, R. J. (1994). Block of the rat brain IIA sodium channel alpha subunit by the neuroprotective drug riluzole. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10187-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.