Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat brain: a reevaluation of [3H]WB4104 and [3H]prazosin binding.

Morrow, A L, Creese, I·1986·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

[3H]Prazosin and [3H]WB4101 [2-(2,6-dimethoxyphenoxyethyl)aminomethyl-1,4 benzodioxane] have both been proposed to label alpha 1-adrenergic receptors in the rat central nervous system. As many discrepancies between the binding of these two ligands have arisen, we conducted these studies in order to reevaluate their binding characteristics and resolve the similarities and differences in the pharmacological characteristics of their respective binding sites. [3H]Prazosin binding is characterized by a monophasic saturation isotherm. Prazosin, indoramine, and dihydroergocryptine competitions with [3H]prazosin are steep and monophasic, and model best to a single binding site. In contrast, phentolamine and WB4101 competition curves are shallow in rat cortex, exhibiting Hill coefficients significantly less than 1.0, and model to two binding sites of approximately equal proportions. The higher and lower affinity components are defined as alpha 1A and alpha 1B, respectively. [3H]WB4101 also labels two binding sites in rat cortex and hippocampus with picomolar and nanomolar affinity, respectively. However, the nanomolar binding site is serotonergic and not adrenergic. The picomolar site (KD = 150 pm) has characteristics of an alpha 1-receptor binding site: prazosin, WB4101, and phentolamine affinities for this [3H]WB4101 binding site correlate with their affinities for the highest affinity component (alpha 1A) of [3H]prazosin binding. In addition, the Bmax of this [3H] WB4101-labeled site is equal to one-half of the total [3H]prazosin Bmax. Agonist competitions with [3H]prazosin binding are multiphasic with pseudo-Hill slopes less than 1.0 and with a rank order of affinity of epinephrine greater than norepinephrine greater than phenylephrine. When binding to the alpha 1A component is blocked by a 30 nM phentolamine mask, the same rank order of agonist affinities is preserved. Although the affinities of epinephrine and norepinephrine at the two subtypes are identical, phenylephrine is weaker at the alpha 1B site. The ratio of the potency of phentolamine versus prazosin is about 4 at the alpha 1A component but about 80 at the alpha 1B binding site. We discuss these data in relation to the reported potencies of these antagonists in blocking alpha 1-receptor-mediated responses which may correlate with our designation of alpha 1A or alpha 1B binding sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10258-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Morrow, A. L., & Creese, I.
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-04
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
321-330
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1865252654
Cited by
466
References
0
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat brain: a reevaluation of [3H]WB4104 and [3H]prazosin binding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10258-7
The paper
Morrow, A. L., & Creese, I. (1986). Characterization of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat brain: a reevaluation of [3H]WB4104 and [3H]prazosin binding. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10258-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.