The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antagonist binding properties of five cloned muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells.
Open accessAbstract
A family of five cholinergic muscarinic receptor genes (m1, m2, m3, m4, and m5) has recently been identified and cloned. In order to investigate the pharmacological properties of the individual muscarinic receptors, we have transfected each of these genes into Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) and have established stable cell lines expressing each receptor. In the present study we have examined the antagonist binding properties of each muscarinic receptor. Antagonists were chosen that had previously been proposed to be selective for muscarinic receptor subtypes and included pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, methoctramine, dicyclomine, hexohydrodifenidol, hexahydrosiladifenidol, hexocyclium, and silahexocyclium. m1, m2, and m3 receptors express binding properties similar to those expected of high affinity pirenzepine-type receptors of cerebral cortex ("M1"), low affinity pirenzepine-type receptors of atria ("M2 cardiac type"), and the intermediate affinity pirenzepine-type receptors found in exocrine glands ("M2 glandular type"), respectively. The M1/M2 schema cannot readily accommodate the binding properties of the m4 and m5 receptors. Pirenzepine, methoctramine, and hexahydrosiladifenidol were the most selective agents for the m1, m2, and m3 receptors, respectively. None of the antagonists used in this study were uniquely selective for either the m4 or m5 receptors. The diverse binding profiles of individual cloned receptors and the widespread distribution of m1-m4 mRNAs indicate that radioligand binding studies performed on primary tissues may actually be assessing the composite properties of a heterogeneous mixture of muscarinic receptor subtypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Binding of antidepressants to human brain receptors: focus on newer generation compounds
Cusack, B., Nelson, A., & Richelson, E. (1994) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244985 · Cited by 349
Berkeley, J. L., Gomeza, J., Wess, J., Hamilton, S. E., Nathanson, N. M., & Levey, A. I. (2001) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1006/mcne.2001.1042 · Cited by 98
Ma, X.-H., Zhong, P., Gu, Z., Feng, J., & Yan, Z. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-04-01159.2003 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, N. J., Bonner, T. I., Buckley, C. M., & Brann, M. R.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-476
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1828770259
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antagonist binding properties of five cloned muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)11261-3
- The paper
- Buckley, N. J., Bonner, T. I., Buckley, C. M., & Brann, M. R. (1989). Antagonist binding properties of five cloned muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)11261-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.