Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Pressure Reversal of General Anesthesia and the Critical Volume Hypothesis

MILLER, K.W., PATON, W.D.M., SMITH, R.A., SMITH, E.B.·1973·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

The anesthetic potencies (ED50) of four gaseous anesthetics and five liquid anesthetics were first determined in newts, using the abolition of righting reflex measured by the rolling response at 20°. The following results were obtained: N2O, 0.69 atm; N2, 21.5 atm; SF6, 1.82 atm; CF4, 11.0 atm; CHCl3 0.89 mM; butanol, 16.7 mM; pentobarbitone sodium, 0.85 mM; halothane, 0.39 mM; ether, 25 mM. The ability of elevated pressures to antagonize the effect of these anesthetics was then studied. For the liquid anesthetics, a graded response to pressure was observed and the reversibility of the antagonistic effect was demonstrated. Dose-response curves were obtained for the interaction of pressure with the gaseous anesthetics, and, from these, ED50 values at various pressures have been interpolated. The data are used to compare the Meyer-Overton and the critical volume hypotheses; the latter not only is consistent with the data but also provides explanations for the antagonistic phenomenon and the lack of anesthetic effect for helium, neon, and hydrogen. The critical volume hypothesis is developed for three solvent model systems, from which estimates of the compressibility of the site of action are made.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13842-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
MILLER, K. W., PATON, W. D. M., SMITH, R. A., & SMITH, E. B.
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1973-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
131-143
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1941471478
Cited by
236
References
0
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pressure Reversal of General Anesthesia and the Critical Volume Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13842-x
The paper
MILLER, K. W., PATON, W. D. M., SMITH, R. A., & SMITH, E. B. (1973). The Pressure Reversal of General Anesthesia and the Critical Volume Hypothesis. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13842-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.