The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Pressure Reversal of General Anesthesia and the Critical Volume Hypothesis
Abstract
The anesthetic potencies (ED50) of four gaseous anesthetics and five liquid anesthetics were first determined in newts, using the abolition of righting reflex measured by the rolling response at 20°. The following results were obtained: N2O, 0.69 atm; N2, 21.5 atm; SF6, 1.82 atm; CF4, 11.0 atm; CHCl3 0.89 mM; butanol, 16.7 mM; pentobarbitone sodium, 0.85 mM; halothane, 0.39 mM; ether, 25 mM. The ability of elevated pressures to antagonize the effect of these anesthetics was then studied. For the liquid anesthetics, a graded response to pressure was observed and the reversibility of the antagonistic effect was demonstrated. Dose-response curves were obtained for the interaction of pressure with the gaseous anesthetics, and, from these, ED50 values at various pressures have been interpolated. The data are used to compare the Meyer-Overton and the critical volume hypotheses; the latter not only is consistent with the data but also provides explanations for the antagonistic phenomenon and the lack of anesthetic effect for helium, neon, and hydrogen. The critical volume hypothesis is developed for three solvent model systems, from which estimates of the compressibility of the site of action are made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Hofmeister effect and the behaviour of water at interfaces
Collins, K. D., & Washabaugh, M. W. (1985) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583500005369 · Cited by 1,605
General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal
Franks, N. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2372 · Cited by 1,295
Stereospecific Effects of Inhalational General Anesthetic Optical Isomers on Nerve Ion Channels
Franks, N. P., & Lieb, W. R. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1925602 · Cited by 280
Electron spin changes during general anesthesia in Drosophila
Turin, L., Skoulakis, E. M. C., & Horsfield, A. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1404387111 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- MILLER, K. W., PATON, W. D. M., SMITH, R. A., & SMITH, E. B.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1973-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-143
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1941471478
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pressure Reversal of General Anesthesia and the Critical Volume Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13842-x
- The paper
- MILLER, K. W., PATON, W. D. M., SMITH, R. A., & SMITH, E. B. (1973). The Pressure Reversal of General Anesthesia and the Critical Volume Hypothesis. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13842-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.