Cited by 157Diversity and Career in MedicineCareer Development and DiversityMedical Education and Admissions

Pipeline Programs in the Health Professions, Part 1: Preserving Diversity and Reducing Health Disparities

Smith, Sonya G., Nsiah-Kumi, Phyllis A., Jones, Pamela R., Pamies, Rubens J.·2009·Journal of the National Medical Association

Abstract

Background Racial and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the health professions. Affirmative action and educational pipeline programs play a vital role in increasing the diversity of health professions, addressing educational opportunity gaps, and reducing health disparities. Part 1 of this 2-part series discusses the need for educational pipeline programs to assist underrepresented minorities (URMs) in entering the health professions and the importance of these programs in developing a cadre of diverse providers to reduce health care inequality. Methods Part 1 presents an overview of diversity in the medical and health care workforce, educational enrichment programs, key components of successful pipeline programs, and notable pipeline examples for underrepresented students at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Recommendations for improving and developing pipeline programs are also included. Part 2 reviews affirmative action case law and legislation along with recommendations for maintaining and reviewing diversity pipeline programs in light of recent anti-affirmative action challenges. Conclusion Pipeline programs are an important strategy for addressing the shortage of URMs in the health professions. Anti-affirmative action initiatives threaten the existence of these student preparation programs and the ability of our nation to produce physicians of color and other health care providers who are more likely to serve in underrepresented communities and work to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31030-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prehealth pathway and enrichment programs continue to be key in recruiting, retaining, and advancing students by helping overcome these barriers and enhancing skills and competencies necessary to succeed in health care careers.

    “Prehealth pathway and enrichment programs continue to be key in recruiting, retaining, and advancing students by helping overcome these barriers and enhancing skills and competencies necessary to succeed in health care careers.8”
  • Many institutions offer pipeline programs to address educational and social barriers to successful matriculation into health professional schools faced by economically and educationally underserved and/or URM groups.

    “In response, many institutions offer “pipeline” programs, interventions addressing the educational and social barriers to successful matriculation into health professional schools faced by economically and educationally underserved and/or URM groups.8–12”
  • Limited program evaluation data hinder program developers' ability to quantify successful attainment of stated goals.

    “Limited program evaluation data hinder program developers' ability to quantify successful attainment of stated goals: A consensus on the methods and benchmarks used to define successful programs and the factors that influence them are lacking.8”
  • A consensus on the methods and benchmarks used to define successful pipeline programs and the factors that influence them is lacking.

    “Limited program evaluation data hinder program developers' ability to quantify successful attainment of stated goals: A consensus on the methods and benchmarks used to define successful programs and the factors that influence them are lacking.8”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S. G., Nsiah-Kumi, P. A., Jones, P. R., & Pamies, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Sonya G.
Venue
Journal of the National Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
101
Issue
9
Pages
836-851
ISSN
0027-9684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1840093766
Cited by
157
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the National Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
underrepresented minorities, affirmative action, health disparities, medical school admissions, University of Nebraska Medical Center
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Career Choice, Child, Employment, Female, Health Personnel, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Nebraska, Poverty, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Program Evaluation, Cultural Diversity, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review