The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 26,755
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
Myers, J. L., & Winer, B. J. (1964) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419292 · Cited by 8,058
The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation
Jasper, H. H. (1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · Cited by 6,567
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,937
Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7350657 · Cited by 4,888
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography
(1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1 · Cited by 2,717
Gazzaniga, M. S., & Bizzi, E. (2000) · Cited by 2,547
Cairns, H. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416113 · Cited by 1,920
Cited by
Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.787 · Cited by 622
Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing
Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101 · Cited by 485
Schmid, M. S. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511852046 · Cited by 408
Linking Brainwaves to the Brain: An ERP Primer
Key, A. P. F., Dove, G. O., & Maguire, M. J. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2702_1 · Cited by 398
Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies
Kissler, J., Assadollahi, R., & Herbert, C. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56008-x · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M.
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1531-1549
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060123034
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00053-1
- The paper
- Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00053-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
