Cited by 474Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationAction Observation and Synchronization

Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study

Fadiga, Luciano, Buccino, Giovanni, Craighero, Laila, Fogassi, Leonardo, Gallese, Vittorio, Pavesi, Giovanni·1998·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate whether the excitability of the corticospinal system is selectively affected by motor imagery. To this purpose, we performed two experiments. In the first one we recorded motor evoked potentials from right hand and arm muscles during mental simulation of flexion/extension movements of both distal and proximal joints. In the second experiment we applied magnetic stimulation to the right and the left motor cortex of subjects while they were imagining opening or closing their right or their left hand. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from a hand muscle contralateral to the stimulated cortex. The results demonstrated that the excitability pattern during motor imagery dynamically mimics that occurring during movement execution. In addition, while magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex revealed increased corticospinal excitability when subjects imagined ipsilateral as well as contralateral hand movements, the stimulation of the right motor cortex revealed a facilitatory effect induced by imagery of contralateral hand movements only. In conclusion, motor imagery is a high level process, which, however, manifests itself in the activation of those same cortical circuits that are normally involved in movement execution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00089-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imagined movement activates very wide areas of the brain, especially the pre-motor areas which are strongly linked to the autonomic and emotional centers.

    “Studies have shown that imagined movement activates very wide areas of the brain, especially the pre-motor areas which are strongly linked to the autonomic and emotional centers (Decety, 1996; Fadiga et al., 1998; Oishi et al., 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fadiga, L., Buccino, G., Craighero, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Pavesi, G.
Affiliations
University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Fadiga, Luciano
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
147-158
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091433716
Cited by
474
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
motor imagery, corticospinal excitability, motor evoked potentials, motor cortex, movement execution, transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Electromyography, Female, Hand, Humans, Imagination, Functional Laterality, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Spinal Cord, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Electromagnetic Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review