Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to investigate whether the excitability of the corticospinal system is selectively affected by motor imagery. To this purpose, we performed two experiments. In the first one we recorded motor evoked potentials from right hand and arm muscles during mental simulation of flexion/extension movements of both distal and proximal joints. In the second experiment we applied magnetic stimulation to the right and the left motor cortex of subjects while they were imagining opening or closing their right or their left hand. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from a hand muscle contralateral to the stimulated cortex. The results demonstrated that the excitability pattern during motor imagery dynamically mimics that occurring during movement execution. In addition, while magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex revealed increased corticospinal excitability when subjects imagined ipsilateral as well as contralateral hand movements, the stimulation of the right motor cortex revealed a facilitatory effect induced by imagery of contralateral hand movements only. In conclusion, motor imagery is a high level process, which, however, manifests itself in the activation of those same cortical circuits that are normally involved in movement execution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Imagined movement activates very wide areas of the brain, especially the pre-motor areas which are strongly linked to the autonomic and emotional centers.
“Studies have shown that imagined movement activates very wide areas of the brain, especially the pre-motor areas which are strongly linked to the autonomic and emotional centers (Decety, 1996; Fadiga et al., 1998; Oishi et al., 2000).”
From Somatic experiencing: using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Fadiga et al., 1998
Cites
The timing of mentally represented actions
Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80088-9 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126 · see citing works
Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0314 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Somatic experiencing: using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy
Payne, P., Levine, P. A., & Crane-Godreau, M. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00093 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Emotional stimuli modulate readiness for action: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
van Loon, A. M., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., van Stegeren, A. H., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Hajcak, G. (2010) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.10.2.174 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Covert speech arrest induced by rTMS over both motor and nonmotor left hemisphere frontal sites
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Cattaneo, L., Rochat, M., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929054021157 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Lepage, J.-F., Saint-Amour, D., & Théoret, H. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.07.021 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Mind-Body Medicine for Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review
Senders, A., Wahbeh, H., Spain, R., & Shinto, L. (2012) · Autoimmune Diseases · doi:10.1155/2012/567324 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Boggio, P. S., Asthana, M. K., Costa, T. L., Valasek, C. A., & Osório, A. A. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00294 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Can we decode phonetic features in inner speech using surface electromyography?
Nalborczyk, L., Grandchamp, R., Koster, E. H. W., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., & Lœvenbruck, H. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233282 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Nakayama, K., Moher, J., & Song, J.-H. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-043229 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fadiga, L., Buccino, G., Craighero, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Pavesi, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Parma (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Fadiga, Luciano
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-158
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091433716
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- motor imagery, corticospinal excitability, motor evoked potentials, motor cortex, movement execution, transcranial magnetic stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Electromyography, Female, Hand, Humans, Imagination, Functional Laterality, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Spinal Cord, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Electromagnetic Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review