The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Provider encouragement of breast-feeding: evidence from a national survey
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of provider encouragement on breast-feeding among women of different social and ethnic backgrounds in the United States. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 2017 parents with children younger than 3 years was surveyed by telephone. The responses of the 1229 women interviewed were included in the analysis. Respondents were asked to recall whether their physicians or nurses had encouraged or discouraged them from breast-feeding. The effects of provider encouragement on breast-feeding initiation and duration were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. The sample was then stratified to allow subset analyses by race and ethnicity, education, income class, age group, and marital status. RESULTS: More than one-third (34.4%) of respondents did not initiate breast-feeding. Three-fourths (73.2%) of women reported having been encouraged by their physicians or nurses to breast-feed; 74.6% of women who were encouraged initiated breast-feeding, compared with only 43.2% of those who were not encouraged (P < 0.001). Women who were encouraged to breast-feed were more than four times (relative risk 4.39; 95% confidence interval 2.96, 6.49) as likely to initiate breast-feeding as women who did not receive encouragement. The influence of provider encouragement was significant across all strata of the sample. In populations traditionally less likely to breast-feed, provider encouragement significantly increased breast-feeding initiation, by more than threefold among low-income, young, and less-educated women; by nearly fivefold among black women; and by nearly 11-fold among single women. CONCLUSION: Provider encouragement significantly increases breast-feeding initiation among American women of all social and ethnic backgrounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevention of Pediatric Overweight and Obesity
Committee on Nutrition (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.2.424 · Cited by 1,245
Clinician Support and Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Breastfeeding Discontinuation
Taveras, E. M., Capra, A. M., Braveman, P. A., Jensvold, N. G., Escobar, G. J., & Lieu, T. A. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.112.1.108 · Cited by 503
Breastfeeding Continues to Increase Into the New Millennium
Ryan, A. S., Wenjun, Z., & Acosta, A. (2002) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.110.6.1103 · Cited by 454
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breastfeeding
Jones, K. M., Power, M. L., Queenan, J. T., & Schulkin, J. (2015) · Breastfeeding Medicine · doi:10.1089/bfm.2014.0152 · Cited by 408
A systematic review of professional support interventions for breastfeeding
Hannula, L., Kaunonen, M., & Tarkka, M. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02239.x · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290-295
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004771470
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Provider encouragement of breast-feeding: evidence from a national survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01116-9
- The paper
- Lu, M. (2001). Provider encouragement of breast-feeding: evidence from a national survey. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01116-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.