The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess hysterectomy rates, type of hysterectomy, and other factors associated within the United States from 1990-1997. METHODS: A descriptive statistical analysis of national discharge data was undertaken. Data from the nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (from which national estimates are generated based on a 20% stratified sample of US community hospitals) were used for the years 1990-1997. All women who underwent hysterectomy were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, procedure codes. Outcome measures included rate, type of hysterectomy, age of patients, length of stay, total hospital charges, and diagnostic categories. RESULTS: Rates of hysterectomy have not changed significantly over the years from 1990-1997. Rates for hysterectomy in 1990 were 5.5 per 1000 women and increased slightly by 1997 to 5.6 per 1000 women. The type of hysterectomy has changed, with laparoscopic hysterectomy accounting for 9.9% of cases by 1997, with a concomitant decline in abdominal hysterectomy but no substantial change in vaginal hysterectomy rates. Length of stay decreased and total charges increased for all types of hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy are associated with shorter length of stay than abdominal hysterectomy. Abdominal hysterectomy is the most common procedure (63.0% in 1997). CONCLUSION: The majority of hysterectomies are abdominal, and the most common indication is uterine fibroids. The introduction of alternative techniques for controlling abnormal uterine bleeding such as endometrial ablation has not had an impact on hysterectomy rates, and there has only been a limited uptake of laparoscopic approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
State-of-the-science of endocrine disrupting chemicals, 2012
Bergman, Å., Heindel, J., Jobling, S., Kidd, K., & Zoeller, R. T. (2012) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.020 · Cited by 1,388
Zimmermann, A., Bernuit, D., Gerlinger, C., Schaefers, M., & Geppert, K. (2012) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/1472-6874-12-6 · Cited by 556
Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997
Boyles, S. H., Weber, A. M., & Meyn, L. (2003) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2003.101 · Cited by 501
Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors
Nygaard, I., Bradley, C., & Brandt, D. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000136100.10818.d8 · Cited by 355
USA endometrial cancer projections to 2030: should we be concerned?
Sheikh, M. A., Althouse, A. D., Freese, K. E., Soisson, S., Edwards, R. P., Welburn, S., Sukumvanich, P., Comerci, J., Kelley, J., LaPorte, R. E., et al. (2014) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon.14.192 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Farquhar, C.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-234
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013546250
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01723-9
- The paper
- Farquhar, C. (2002). Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01723-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.