Cited by 1,388Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEstrogen and related hormone effectsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

State-of-the-science of endocrine disrupting chemicals, 2012

Bergman, Åke, Heindel, Jerrold, Jobling, Susan, Kidd, Karen, Zoeller, R. Thomas·2012·Toxicology Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.020

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BPA is present in polycarbonate plastics, the epoxy lining of canned foods, thermal paper, and other common household products; it is classified as a high volume production compound and continuous low level exposure is virtually ubiquitous and unavoidable.

    “Present in polycarbonate plastics, the epoxy lining of canned foods, thermal paper, and other common household products, BPA is classified as a “high volume production” compound and continuous low level (resulting in mean blood levels of 4 ng/ml or lower) exposure is virtually ubiquitous and unavoidable (85).”
  • In mouse cerebral cortex, tri-, di-, and monobutyltin altered cholinergic synaptic parameters relevant to neurotransmission.

    “Organotin compounds can also directly impair synaptic communication: in mouse cerebral cortex, tri-, di-, and monobutyltin altered cholinergic synaptic parameters relevant to neurotransmission.”
  • Pesticides are not only general neurotoxicants but can also interfere directly with the molecular and synaptic processes that support neural plasticity.

    “Together, these findings indicate that pesticides are not only general neurotoxicants, but can also interfere directly with the molecular and synaptic processes that support neural plasticity (Bergman et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2023).”
  • Chlorpyrifos exposure dysregulates synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampal neurons, reducing dendritic spine density and decreasing expression of synaptophysin, PSD-95, GluN1, and GluA1.

    “For example, chlorpyrifos exposure dysregulates synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampal neurons, reducing dendritic spine density and decreasing expression of synaptophysin, PSD-95, GluN1, and GluA1.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergman, Å., Heindel, J., Jobling, S., Kidd, K., & Zoeller, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
Venue
Toxicology Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
211
Pages
S3
ISSN
0378-4274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092206838
Cited by
1,388
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 42
FWCI
51.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Toxicology Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, endocrine disruption, ecotoxicology, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review