The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of low-dose aspirin alone versus low-dose aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome and recurrent miscarriage as prophylaxis against pregnancy loss. METHODS: From a regional miscarriage clinic, 119 consecutive women with persistently positive tests for lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin immunoglobulin G and M antibody were invited to participate in a randomized, controlled trial between 1997 and 2000. After ethical approval and adherence to a written protocol, 12 women were unwilling to participate, five failed exclusion/inclusion criteria, and four were nonpregnant. Laboratory analysis was performed by Sheffield University Coagulation Department, electronically generated randomization by Manchester University Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, and data collection and analysis by a research officer at Leeds University. Viability ultrasound every 2 weeks was provided until 12 weeks' gestation before transfer to the pregnancy support antenatal clinic. RESULTS: Ninety-eight women were randomized before 12 weeks' gestation. Forty-seven received low-dose aspirin 75 mg daily (group A), and 51 received low-dose aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin 5000 U subcutaneously daily (group B) throughout pregnancy. There were 13 pregnancy losses and 34 live births in group A and 11 losses and 40 live births in group B. The live-birth rate was 72% in group A and 78% in group B (odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.55, 3.47). There were no cases of maternal thrombosis in either group. CONCLUSION: A high success rate is achieved when low-dose aspirin is used for antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy. The addition of low molecular weight heparin does not significantly improve pregnancy outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Do low-risk pregnant women with antiphospholipid antibodies need to be treated?
Cowchock, S., & Reece, E. A. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70409-5 · Cited by 127
Marked variation in antiphospholipid antibodies during pregnancy: relationships to pregnancy outcome
Topping, J. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.224 · Cited by 57
Cited by
VTE, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy
Bates, S. M., Greer, I. A., Middeldorp, S., Veenstra, D. L., Prabulos, A.-M., & Vandvik, P. O. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2300 · Cited by 1,525
Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69204-0 · Cited by 1,227
Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review
Robertson, L., Wu, O., Langhorne, P., Twaddle, S., Clark, P., Lowe, G. D. O., Walker, I. D., Greaves, M., Brenkel, I., Regan, L., et al. (2006) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05847.x · Cited by 849
Greer, I. A., & Nelson-Piercy, C. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-02-0626 · Cited by 797
Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome
Keeling, D., Mackie, I., Moore, G. W., Greer, I. A., Greaves, M., & British Committee for Standards in Haematology (2012) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09037.x · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Farquharson, R.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 408-413
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007748130
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02165-8
- The paper
- Farquharson, R. (2002). Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial of treatment. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02165-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.