The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether epidural analgesia during the first stage of labor is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. METHODS: The association of epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery was examined in a retrospective study of 1733 low-risk, term nulliparas with singleton infants in vertex presentations, in which labor began spontaneously. To evaluate the effect of epidural analgesia on cesarean deliveries, independent of other factors influencing the use of epidural analgesia, we used propensity scores to create five subgroups (quintiles) of women who, based on characteristics discernible at admission, appeared equally likely to receive epidural analgesia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding. RESULTS: Overall, the cesarean rate among women receiving epidural analgesia was 17% (168 of 991), compared with 4% (30 of 742) among those who did not receive epidural analgesia. An increased cesarean rate among women receiving epidural analgesia was present in all propensity quintiles. In an adjusted logistic regression analysis, women receiving epidural analgesia were 3.7 times more likely to undergo a cesarean (95% confidence interval 2.4, 5.7). The greatest increase in cesarean risk was noted when epidural analgesia was administered earlier in labor, but there was a more than twofold increase regardless of the dilation and station at administration of epidural analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia may increase substantially the risk of cesarean delivery. Although the causal nature of this association remains open to debate, prenatal care providers should routinely discuss the risks and benefits of epidural analgesia with women during their pregnancies so that they can make informed decisions about the use of pain relief during labor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.4.403 · Cited by 1,317
Matched Sampling for Causal Effects
Rubin, D. B. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810725 · Cited by 676
The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review
Leighton, B. L., & Halpern, S. H. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70182-8 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- LIEBERMAN, E., MLANG, J., COHEN, A., DAGOSTINOJR, R., DATTA, S., & DFRIGOLETTOJR, F.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 993-1000
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994901814
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00359-6
- The paper
- LIEBERMAN, E., MLANG, J., COHEN, A., DAGOSTINOJR, R., DATTA, S., & DFRIGOLETTOJR, F. (1996). Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00359-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.