Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas

LIEBERMAN, E, MLANG, J, COHEN, A, DAGOSTINOJR, R, DATTA, S, DFRIGOLETTOJR, F·1996·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether epidural analgesia during the first stage of labor is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. METHODS: The association of epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery was examined in a retrospective study of 1733 low-risk, term nulliparas with singleton infants in vertex presentations, in which labor began spontaneously. To evaluate the effect of epidural analgesia on cesarean deliveries, independent of other factors influencing the use of epidural analgesia, we used propensity scores to create five subgroups (quintiles) of women who, based on characteristics discernible at admission, appeared equally likely to receive epidural analgesia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounding. RESULTS: Overall, the cesarean rate among women receiving epidural analgesia was 17% (168 of 991), compared with 4% (30 of 742) among those who did not receive epidural analgesia. An increased cesarean rate among women receiving epidural analgesia was present in all propensity quintiles. In an adjusted logistic regression analysis, women receiving epidural analgesia were 3.7 times more likely to undergo a cesarean (95% confidence interval 2.4, 5.7). The greatest increase in cesarean risk was noted when epidural analgesia was administered earlier in labor, but there was a more than twofold increase regardless of the dilation and station at administration of epidural analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia may increase substantially the risk of cesarean delivery. Although the causal nature of this association remains open to debate, prenatal care providers should routinely discuss the risks and benefits of epidural analgesia with women during their pregnancies so that they can make informed decisions about the use of pain relief during labor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00359-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
LIEBERMAN, E., MLANG, J., COHEN, A., DAGOSTINOJR, R., DATTA, S., & DFRIGOLETTOJR, F.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
1996-12
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
993-1000
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994901814
Cited by
172
References
0
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00359-6
The paper
LIEBERMAN, E., MLANG, J., COHEN, A., DAGOSTINOJR, R., DATTA, S., & DFRIGOLETTOJR, F. (1996). Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00359-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.