The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a triphasic, combination oral contraceptive (OC), (norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol), in comparison with placebo in the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris. METHODS: Two hundred fifty women were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Subjects were 15-49 years old and had moderate acne vulgaris. Each month for 6 months, subjects received either 3 consecutive weeks of active OC treatment followed by 1 week of inactive drug, or 4 consecutive weeks of color-matched placebo tablets. Efficacy was assessed by facial acne lesion counts, the investigator's global assessment, and the subject's self-assessment. Hormone levels were also measured. RESULTS: Despite the large placebo effect inherent in an acne trial (due to, for example, careful skin care, frequent office visits, regression to the mean), of the 164 subjects who completed the study without major protocol deviations, the OC group was significantly better than the placebo group for all primary efficacy measures: inflammatory lesions (mean reduction, 51.4% compared to 34.6%; P = .01), total lesions (mean reduction, 46.4% compared to 33.9%; P = .001); investigator's global assessment (83.3% compared to 62.5%; P = .001). Free testosterone decreased significantly and sex hormone-binding globulin increased significantly in the OC group, but remained unchanged in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: A triphasic combination of norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol is an effective treatment for moderate acne vulgaris in women with no known contraindication to OC therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Androgen Excess in Women: Experience with Over 1000 Consecutive Patients
Azziz, R., Sanchez, L. A., Knochenhauer, E. S., Moran, C., Lazenby, J., Stephens, K. C., Taylor, K., & Boots, L. R. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-031122 · Cited by 1,132
Gollnick, H., Cunliffe, W., Berson, D., Dreno, B., Finlay, A., Leyden, J. J., Shalita, A. R., & Thiboutot, D. (2003) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.618 · Cited by 817
Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris
Reynolds, R. V., Yeung, H., Cheng, C. E., Cook-Bolden, F., Desai, S. R., Druby, K. M., Freeman, E. E., Keri, J. E., Stein Gold, L. F., Tan, J. K. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2023.12.017 · Cited by 518
Role of Hormones in Pilosebaceous Unit Development
Deplewski, D., & Rosenfield, R. L. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.4.0404 · Cited by 443
Haider, A. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.6.726 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- REDMOND, G., OLSON, W., LIPPMAN, J., KAFRISSEN, M., JONES, T., & JORIZZO, J.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 615-622
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022871441
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00059-8
- The paper
- REDMOND, G., OLSON, W., LIPPMAN, J., KAFRISSEN, M., JONES, T., & JORIZZO, J. (1997). Norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00059-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.