Cited by 376Menstrual Health and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumOvarian function and disorders

Progesterone metabolite allopregnanolone in women with premenstrual syndrome

RAPKIN, A, MORGAN, M, GOLDMAN, L, BRANN, D, SIMONE, D, MAHESH, V·1997·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anxiolytic 3alpha-5alpha-reduced progesterone metabolite allopregnanolone in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and controls. METHODS: Thirty-five women with prospectively documented PMS and 36 controls were evaluated. Serum progesterone and allopregnanolone levels were measured on days 19 and 26 of the cycle as determined by urinary LH detection kits. Analysis of variance and Student t tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Allopregnanolone levels were significantly lower on day 26 in the PMS group than in controls (3.6 +/- 0.8 versus 7.5 +/- 1.3 ng/mL; P < .04). Significant differences in the ratio of the metabolite to progesterone also were noted, with a smaller ratio in the PMS subjects (0.9 +/- 0.3 versus 3.2 +/- 1.3 ng/mL; P < .05). There were no significant differences between the PMS and control groups with respect to serum progesterone levels. CONCLUSION: Subjects with PMS manifested lower levels of the anxiolytic metabolite allopregnanolone in the luteal phase when compared with controls. Diminished concentrations of allopregnanolone in women with PMS may lead to an inability to enhance gamma aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition during states of altered central nervous system excitability, such as ovulation or physiologic or psychological stress. The lowered metabolite levels could contribute to the genesis of various mood symptoms of the disorder, such as anxiety, tension, and depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00417-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 376

Authors
RAPKIN, A., MORGAN, M., GOLDMAN, L., BRANN, D., SIMONE, D., & MAHESH, V
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
RAPKIN, A
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
1997-11
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
709-714
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038415949
Cited by
376
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
allopregnanolone, premenstrual syndrome, progesterone metabolites, luteal phase, serum progesterone, GABAergic inhibition, menstrual cycle, mood symptoms, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Isomerism, Luteal Phase, Pregnanolone, Premenstrual Syndrome, Progesterone, Prospective Studies, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Case-Control Studies, GABA Modulators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review