Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Compared With the General Obstetric Population

Casey, B·1997·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcome in a homogeneous group of women with glucose intolerance with that of women without this disorder. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton cephalic-presenting pregnancies delivered at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center during the period January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1995. During this period, women were screened selectively for glucose intolerance and National Diabetes Data Group thresholds were used to diagnose gestational diabetes. Women with class A1 gestational diabetes were compared with nondiabetic women within the cohort. Effects of confounding variables were analyzed using multiple logistic regression and a matched-control comparison. Controls were matched according to ethnicity, maternal age, maternal weight, and parity. RESULTS: A total of 61,209 nondiabetic women with singleton cephalic pregnancies were delivered during the study period, and 874 were diagnosed with class A1 gestational diabetes. Women with class A1 gestational diabetes were significantly older, heavier, of greater parity, and more often of Hispanic ethnicity. Hypertension (17 versus 12%), cesarean delivery (30 versus 17%), and shoulder dystocia (3 versus 1%) were significantly increased (all P < .001) in these women compared with the general obstetric population. Infants born to women with class A1 gestational diabetes were significantly larger (mean birth weight 3581 +/- 616 versus 3290 +/- 546 g, P < .001), and this accounted for the increased incidence of dystocia. The attributable risk for large for gestational age (LGA) infants due to class A1 gestational diabetes was 12%. CONCLUSION: The main consequence of class A1 gestational diabetes is excessive fetal size leading to increased risk of difficult labor and delivery. We estimate that approximately one of eight women with class A1 gestational diabetes mellitus delivers an LGA infant attributable to glucose intolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00542-5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Casey, B.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
1997-12
Volume
90
Issue
6
Pages
869-873
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965900336
Cited by
437
References
19
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Compared With the General Obstetric Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00542-5
The paper
Casey, B. (1997). Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Compared With the General Obstetric Population. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00542-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.