The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leuprolide Acetate Depot and Hormonal Add-Back in Endometriosis: A 12-Month Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a GnRH agonist, leuprolide acetate depot, alone and in combination with three hormonal add-back regimens in the management of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. METHODS: Two hundred and one patients were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 1-year trial. All patients were given an intramuscular injection of leuprolide acetate depot 3.75 mg every 4 weeks. Patients were assigned to one of four treatment groups: Group A received placebos for progestin and estrogen, group B received norethindrone acetate 5 mg daily and placebo for estrogen, group C received norethindrone acetate 5 mg and conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg daily, and group D received norethindrone acetate 5 mg and conjugated equine estrogens 1.25 mg daily. Pelvic pain scores were assessed monthly, and bone density was measured after 24 and 52 weeks. RESULTS: By week 8, all four groups showed significant improvement in pelvic pain scores compared with baseline levels. A higher proportion of group D patients terminated the study prematurely due to a lack of improvement in symptoms. Group A experienced a 6.3 +/- 2.3% (P < or = .001) loss in bone density after 52 weeks of treatment, whereas bone density was preserved in all three add-back groups. CONCLUSION: The use of leuprolide acetate depot in combination with norethindrone acetate 5 mg alone, or with norethindrone acetate and conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg, provides effective suppression of pelvic pain symptoms associated with endometriosis while protecting against bone loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valery (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520270033028 · Cited by 2,320
Hormone treatment of endometriosis: The estrogenthreshold hypothesis
Barbieri, R. L. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91706-g · Cited by 335
Dlugi, A. M., Miller, J. D., & Knittle, J. (1990) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53755-8 · Cited by 279
Dosage aspects of danazol therapy in endometriosis: Short-term and long-term effectiveness
Biberoglu, K. O., & Behrman, S. J. (1981) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(81)90478-6 · Cited by 267
Cited by
Giudice, L. C. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1000274 · Cited by 1,924
Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Pain with Elagolix, an Oral GnRH Antagonist
Taylor, H. S., Giudice, L. C., Lessey, B. A., Abrao, M. S., Kotarski, J., Archer, D. F., Diamond, M. P., Surrey, E., Johnson, N. P., Watts, N. B., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1700089 · Cited by 511
Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a committee opinion
(2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.012 · Cited by 397
Olive, D. L., & Pritts, E. A. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107263450407 · Cited by 340
Reevaluating response and failure of medical treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review
Becker, C. M., Gattrell, W. T., Gude, K., & Singh, S. S. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.004 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornstein, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-24
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090062039
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leuprolide Acetate Depot and Hormonal Add-Back in Endometriosis: A 12-Month Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00620-0
- The paper
- Hornstein, M. (1998). Leuprolide Acetate Depot and Hormonal Add-Back in Endometriosis: A 12-Month Study. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00620-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.