CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and fetal healthcareNeurological Complications and Syndromes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Ananth, C·1999·Obstetrics & Gynecology
DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00408-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the literature and summarize the relationship between cigarette smoking and placental abruption, and to evaluate the joint influences of smoking and hypertensive disorders (chronic hypertension and preeclampsia) on the subsequent development of abruption. Data sources We reviewed studies identified through a MEDLINE literature search between 1966 and 1997 and through studies cited in the references of published reports. Methods of study selection A total of 13 observational (seven case-control and six cohort) studies were identified which included a total of 1,358,083 pregnancies. We excluded case reports on placental abruption, and restricted the literature search to studies published in English. A meta-analysis was performed by computing pooled odds ratios based on random-effects models describing the association between placental abruption, smoking, and hypertensive disorders. Potential sources of heterogeneity among these studies were explored in detail. Tabulation, integration, and results The overall incidence of placental abruption was 0.64% (8724 of 1,358,623). Smoking was associated with a 90% increase in the risk of placental abruption (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8, 2.0). This pattern was consistent by study design (case-control compared with cohort studies) and smoking prevalence (low compared with high prevalence, defined as less than 30% compared with 30% or more, respectively). However, the association…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00408-6

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–236 of 236

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ananth, C.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Ananth, C
ORCID
Ananth, C
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
1999-04
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
622-628
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00408-6
OpenAlex
W2007519298
Cited by
236
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
Keywords
placental abruption, cigarette smoking during pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, chronic hypertension in pregnancy, preeclampsia, risk factors, population attributable risk, dose-response relationship, smoking prevalence, smoking cessation interventions, smoking cessation counseling
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Smoking, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review