The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone mineral density in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception on bone mineral density in reproductive-age women. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional comparison of bone mineral density levels in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and in women of similar age not using this method. The study recruited 457 nonpregnant women aged 18-39 years who were enrollees of a Washington state health maintenance organization. One hundred eighty-three women were receiving injections and 274 were not. Bone mineral density at several anatomic sites (spine, femoral neck, greater trochanter, and whole body) was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Data on other factors potentially related to bone density were collected through questionnaire and examination. RESULTS: Overall, age-adjusted mean bone density levels were lower for users of this method than for nonusers at all anatomic sites: The mean difference was 2.5% for the spine (P = .03) and 2.2% for the femoral neck (P = .12). Exposure to depot medroxyprogesterone acetate continued to be significantly (P < .01) associated with decreased bone density at the femoral neck, spine, and trochanter after multivariate adjustment for other risk factors related to bone density. Age-specific comparisons indicated that the major differences in bone density between users and nonusers occurred in the youngest age group (women 18-21 years); the mean femoral neck bone density was 10.5% lower (P < .01) for the exposed women, and differences were consistent (P < .01) across all anatomic sites. We also noted a significant dose-response relation between longer use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and decreased bone density levels in this age group (P < .01 for all sites). CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence that contraception with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, particularly long-term use, may adversely affect bone mineral density levels in young women aged 18-21 years. The implications for future bone health need further study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of major sources of concerns regarding prolonged use of DMPA is the decrease of BMD and the increase risk of fracture, due to estrogen deficiency accompanying its use.”
From Oral and depot progestin therapy for endometriosis: towards a personalized medicine (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
Bone Gain in Young Adult Women
Recker, R. R. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490170075028 · Cited by 801
Relationship of Bone Turnover to Bone Density and Fractures
Melton, L. J., Khosla, S., Atkinson, E. J., O’Fallon, W. M., & Riggs, B. L. (1997) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.7.1083 · Cited by 350
Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.
Cundy, T., Evans, M. C., Roberts, H., Wattie, D. J., Ames, R. W., & Reid, I. R. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.303.6793.13 · Cited by 249
Cromer, B. A., Blair, J. M., Mahan, J. D., Zibners, L., & Naumovski, Z. (1996) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70148-8 · Cited by 241
Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements
Johnson, J. L., & Dawson‐Hughes, B. (1991) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02556113 · Cited by 228
Pharmacokinetics of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception.
Mishell, D. R. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 210
Ortiz, A., Hiroi, M., Stanczyk, F. Z., Goebelsmann, U., & Mishell, D. R. (1977) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-44-1-32 · Cited by 188
Ott, S. M. (1990) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-71-5-1082 · Cited by 176
Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial
Black, D. M., Reiss, T. F., Nevitt, M. C., Cauley, J. A., Karpf, D. B., & Cummings, S. R. (1993) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/bf01623005 · Cited by 175
Cummings, S. R., & Black, D. M. (1995) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(05)80041-5 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–140 of 140
Impact de la contraception estroprogestative et progestative sur la densité minérale osseuse
Trémollières, F. (2005) · Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité · doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.05.016 · Cited by 9
Association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), physical activity and bone health
Babatunde, O. O., & Forsyth, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism · doi:10.1007/s00774-013-0497-y · Cited by 8
Non-oral hormonal contraception
Gupta, S. (2006) · Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.11.008 · Cited by 8
Harel, Z., Wolter, K. D., Gold, M. A., Cromer, B. A., Bruner, A., Stager, M., Bachrach, L. K., Hertweck, P., Nelson, A., Nelson, D. A., et al. (2010) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2009.11.004 · Cited by 8
Modesto, W., Bahamondes, M. V., dos Santos, P. S., Fernandes, A. M. D. S., Dal’Ava, N., & Bahamondes, L. G. (2014) · The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.3109/13625187.2014.924098 · Cited by 7
Evaluation of the Patient with Osteoporosis or at Risk for Osteoporosis
Kleerekoper, M. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012470862-4/50058-1 · Cited by 7
Recent clinical issues related to the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera®)
Cromer, B. A. (1999) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00001703-199910000-00009 · Cited by 6
Steroidal contraceptives: effect on bone fractures in women
Lopez, L. M., Grimes, D. A., Schulz, K. F., & Curtis, K. M. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006033.pub2 · Cited by 6
Lee, J., Park, S. M., Ko, Y.-J., & Song, Y. S. (2013) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000351106 · Cited by 5
Non-oral hormonal contraception
Gupta, S. (2003) · Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1054/cuog.2003.0304 · Cited by 5
Hormonal Contraception and Blood Lead Levels in Inner-City Adolescent Girls
Iglesias, E. A., Coupey, S. M., & MARKOWITZ, M. E. (2008) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2008.05.006 · Cited by 5
In Favor of Continued Use of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera) in Adolescents
Cromer, B. A. (2005) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2005.04.005 · Cited by 5
Bone Mineral Density Assessment in Premenopausal Women
Khan, A. A., & Syed, Z. A. (2006) · Women s Health · doi:10.2217/17455057.2.4.639 · Cited by 5
RETIRED: Injectable Medroxyprogesterone Acetate for Contraception
(2000) · Journal SOGC · doi:10.1016/s0849-5831(16)31121-1 · Cited by 5
Consensus canadien sur la contraception
(2004) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30261-4 · Cited by 4
Study Design to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Hormonal Contraception for Women
Kapp, N., Curtis, K. M., & Borgatta, L. (2007) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e318159bf8a · Cited by 4
Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Women Using Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
Busen, N. H. (2004) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2004.tb00373.x · Cited by 4
Black, A., Guilbert, É., Costescu, D., Dunn, S., Fisher, W. A., Kives, S. L., Mirosh, M., Norman, W. V., Pymar, H. C., Reid, R. L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2016.03.005 · Cited by 4
Hormonal contraception and bone mineral density
Beksinska, M. E., & Smit, J. A. (2011) · Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1586/eog.11.19 · Cited by 4
Schreiber, C. A., & Barnhart, K. T. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4557-2758-2.00036-6 · Cited by 3
Kontrazeption und Schwangerschaft bei Frauen mit Epilepsie - Eine Stellungnahme der DGGEF
Rabe, T., Schwenkhagen, A., & Stodieck, S. R. G. (2009) · Journal für Kardiologie (Krause & Pachernegg GmbH) · Cited by 3
Black, A., Dunn, S., Guilbert, É., Léger, F., Mirosh, M., Reid, R. L., Josse, R., Lalonde, A. B., & Senikas, V. (2006) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32126-0 · Cited by 2
Schreiber, C. A., & Barnhart, K. T. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-4907-4.00034-6 · Cited by 2
Mishell, D. R. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-02951-3.50017-0 · Cited by 2
Jensen, J. T., & Mishell, D. R. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-06986-1.00013-5 · Cited by 2
Thomas, M. A. (2001) · The Endocrinologist · doi:10.1097/00019616-200103000-00010 · Cited by 2
Cromer, B. A. (2004) · Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism · doi:10.1385/bmm:2:2:123 · Cited by 2
Evaluation of the Patient with Osteoporosis or at Risk for Osteoporosis
Nugaram, R., Atmaca, A. A., & Kleerekoper, M. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370544-0.50061-6 · Cited by 1
Beksinska, M. E. (2010) · University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Institutional Repository on DSpace (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg) · Cited by 1
Africander, D. (2010) · SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) · Cited by 1
Gambacciani, M., Lazzarini, V., Vacca, F., & Cappagli, B. (2005) · CNR Solar (Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository) (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche)
Cloutier, K. (2005) · Pharmactuel
Vanegas, O. R. G. (2007) · Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada)
Motivos de retiro del implante subdérmico en el Hospital Escuela de Honduras, 2014 a 2015
Hernández, A. G. G., Rivera-Hernández, A., Funes-Ardón, E., & Cárcamo-Perez, F. (2017) · Ciencia e Investigación Medico Estudiantil Latinoamericana · doi:10.23961/cimel.v22i2.678
Dodick, D. W., & Silberstein, S. D. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780199793617.003.0011
Antikonzeptiva - Gestagenmethoden
MerkiFeld, G., & Münch, M. (2001) · Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum · doi:10.4414/smf.2001.04272
Metadata
- Authors
- Scholes, D.
- Affiliations
- Group Health Cooperative (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scholes, D
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233-238
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974936404
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD31165, R01HD031165)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, bone mineral density, injectable contraceptives, osteoporosis risk, young women, femoral neck, spine, dose-response relationship, long-term contraceptive use, women of reproductive age
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, Femur, Humans, Spine, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review