Cited by 35Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Treatment and the process of care in musculoskeletal conditions

Foster, Nadine E., Pincus, Tamar, Underwood, Martin, Vogel, Steven, Breen, Alan, Harding, Geoff·2003·Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain for which there is not an obvious underlying physical cause is one of the most common reasons for long-term disability. There is a need to develop better ways of managing these problems. Improving the understanding of the basis for decision making, the processes of care, and the beliefs and expectations of patients and health care professionals seems as fundamental as basic laboratory science is to understanding inflammatory arthopathies. Little is known about the beliefs and expectations of patients and health care professionals, nor the multitude of factors such as traditions within professional groups, education, and language that professionals use in decision making. When better understanding of these factors and the mismatch between professionals and patients is achieved, then theoretical frameworks, treatment approaches, and the education of professionals in appropriate management will be improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0030-5898(03)00011-7

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rheumatology practitioners have become interested in helplessness and its link to disability, and some have begun to routinely include assessments of helplessness in their ongoing management of patients with rheumatic disease.

    “rheumatology practitioners have become quite interested in helplessness and its link to disability, and some have begun to routinely include assessments of helplessness in their ongoing management of patients with rheumatic disease.25,93,136”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, N. E., Pincus, T., Underwood, M., Vogel, S., Breen, A., & Harding, G.
Affiliations
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University College of Osteopathy (GB)
  • Health Sciences University (GB)
Corresponding author
Foster, Nadine E.
Venue
Orthopedic Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
239-244
ISSN
0030-5898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980354849
Cited by
35
References
67
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Orthopedic Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic musculoskeletal pain, long-term disability, process of care, clinical decision-making, professional education, treatment options
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Process Assessment, Health Care, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Interdisciplinary Communication, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review