Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pharmacology of mesocortical dopamine neurons.

Bannon, M J, Roth, R H·1983·Pharmacological Reviews

Abstract

The current information on the pharmacology and function of the DA innervation to the prefrontal cortex is a synthesis of data from several initially distinct areas of research. Some possible functions of the mesocortical DA system are suggested from the extensive studies conducted on the role of the prefrontal cortex in behavior, and also from the data on prefrontal cortical modulation of the output of subcortical DA systems. Meanwhile, anatomical, behavioral, biochemical, and electrophysiological studies on mesocortical DA neurons have largely resulted from interest in determining the site(s) and mechanism(s) of action of various psychotropic drugs, and particularly the antipsychotic drugs (DA antagonists). An interrelated field of study has investigated the functional role of DA autoreceptors. The mesocortical DA system possesses many unique characteristics compared to the nigrostriatal/mesolimbic DA systems, including 1) a higher DA turnover rate, 2) a higher rate and different pattern of neuronal discharge, 3) a greatly diminished responsiveness to DA agonists and antagonists, 4) a lack of tolerance to the effect of chronically administered DA antagonists, and 5) a selective activation by footshock stress. These characteristics may be due to the fact that the DA cells projecting to the prefrontal cortex lack DA autoreceptors, an important site for the physiological and pharmacological modulation of subcortical DA systems. This contention is further supported by recent studies on two distinct DA systems innervating, respectively, the anterior cingulate and piriform cortices: the former system, which lacks DA autoreceptors, responds much like the prefrontal cortical DA sy stem; the latter system, which possesses functional DA autoreceptors, manifests a pharmacological responsiveness similar to the nigrostriatal/mesolimbic DA systems (11, 14, 118, 119, 38). Autoreceptors may be an important target for future rational drug design. For example, DA agonists more selective for DA autoreceptors (65, 72) may be useful agents in the treatment of schizophrenia. If, however, these drugs prove ineffective in schizophrenic patients, it might help to explain the equivocal results obtained to date in the treatment of schizophrenia with low (autoreceptor-specific) doses of less selective DA agonists (for a review, see Ref. 97). A lack of clinical efficacy of DA autoreceptor agonists might also suggest that if a DA system is indirectly involved in schizophrenia the site of therapeutic action of antipsychotic drugs is a DA system (such as that innervating the prefrontal cortex) that lacks autoreceptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06572-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Bannon, M. J., & Roth, R. H.
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-03
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
53-68
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1934525866
Cited by
488
References
0
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacology of mesocortical dopamine neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06572-x
The paper
Bannon, M. J., & Roth, R. H. (1983). Pharmacology of mesocortical dopamine neurons. Pharmacological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06572-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.