Cited by 78Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness ResearchInfant Health and Development

The development of infants' circadian rest–activity rhythm and mothers' rhythm

Nishihara, Kyoko, Horiuchi, Shigeko, Eto, Hiromi, Uchida, Sunao·2002·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

In order to know when and how infants obtain their circadian sleep-wake rhythm, infants' developing circadian rest-activity rhythm and mothers' circadian rhythm in the postpartum period were examined using actigraph monitoring. The subjects were 11 primipara and their infants. Actigraphic recordings for the infants and their mothers were made over 3-5 continuous days during the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th weeks after birth. A 24-h peak on a mean autocorrelogram of the infants' movements was detected at the 3rd week. The infants' circadian rest-activity rhythm already existed in the 3rd week. The amplitude of this 24-h peak gradually increased from the 6th to 12th week. This may be useful as an index of the development of infants' circadian rest-activity rhythm. An 11-h peak was also observed at the 3rd week. This 11-h peak was thought to be a semi-circadian rhythm. Regarding the mothers, the amplitude of the 24-h peak on the mean autocorrelogram at the 3rd week was the smallest of all other weeks, and it became larger from the 3rd to 12th week. This meant that the mothers' circadian rhythm at the 3rd week was influenced by their interrupted sleep at night to take care of their infants. The mother-infant synchronization is probably the 1st factor in the entrainment of infants' circadian sleep-wake rhythm. In this study, we also propose a novel method for compensating for missing data in autocorrelogram analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00846-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of the 24-h circadian rest-activity rhythm is observed in infants as young as 3 weeks old and is potentially influenced by a mother's rest-activity cycle and maternal melatonin rhythm.

    “After birth, the development of the 24-h circadian rest-activity rhythm is observed in infants as young as 3 wk old and is potentially influenced by a mother's rest-activity cycle (88) and maternal melatonin rhythm (89).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 78

Authors
Nishihara, K., Horiuchi, S., Eto, H., & Uchida, S.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry (JP)
  • St. Luke's International University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nishihara, Kyoko
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
91-98
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069237108
Cited by
78
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
circadian rest-activity rhythm, postpartum period, entrainment, actigraphy, autocorrelogram, missing data compensation, infant sleep
MeSH terms
Activity Cycles, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Maternal Behavior, Rest, Infant Behavior, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review