The development of infants' circadian rest–activity rhythm and mothers' rhythm
Abstract
In order to know when and how infants obtain their circadian sleep-wake rhythm, infants' developing circadian rest-activity rhythm and mothers' circadian rhythm in the postpartum period were examined using actigraph monitoring. The subjects were 11 primipara and their infants. Actigraphic recordings for the infants and their mothers were made over 3-5 continuous days during the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th weeks after birth. A 24-h peak on a mean autocorrelogram of the infants' movements was detected at the 3rd week. The infants' circadian rest-activity rhythm already existed in the 3rd week. The amplitude of this 24-h peak gradually increased from the 6th to 12th week. This may be useful as an index of the development of infants' circadian rest-activity rhythm. An 11-h peak was also observed at the 3rd week. This 11-h peak was thought to be a semi-circadian rhythm. Regarding the mothers, the amplitude of the 24-h peak on the mean autocorrelogram at the 3rd week was the smallest of all other weeks, and it became larger from the 3rd to 12th week. This meant that the mothers' circadian rhythm at the 3rd week was influenced by their interrupted sleep at night to take care of their infants. The mother-infant synchronization is probably the 1st factor in the entrainment of infants' circadian sleep-wake rhythm. In this study, we also propose a novel method for compensating for missing data in autocorrelogram analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The development of the 24-h circadian rest-activity rhythm is observed in infants as young as 3 weeks old and is potentially influenced by a mother's rest-activity cycle and maternal melatonin rhythm.
“After birth, the development of the 24-h circadian rest-activity rhythm is observed in infants as young as 3 wk old and is potentially influenced by a mother's rest-activity cycle (88) and maternal melatonin rhythm (89).”
From Chronotype: Implications for Epidemiologic Studies on Chrono-Nutrition and Cardiometabolic Health (2019) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Nishihara, K., Horiuchi, S., Eto, H., & Uchida, S.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry (JP)
- St. Luke's International University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Nishihara, Kyoko
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-98
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069237108
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
- Keywords
- circadian rest-activity rhythm, postpartum period, entrainment, actigraphy, autocorrelogram, missing data compensation, infant sleep
- MeSH terms
- Activity Cycles, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Maternal Behavior, Rest, Infant Behavior, Postpartum Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review