Cited by 54Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityStress Responses and Cortisol

The effects of isolation-rearing on sucrose consumption in rats

HALL, F, HUMBY, T, WILKINSON, L, ROBBINS, T·1997·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Three experiments examined the hypothesis that social isolation of weanling rats potentiates hedonic processes by examining the consumption of sucrose solutions. In the first experiment no differences in consumption were found between socially reared rats and isolation-reared rats allowed to consume sucrose in a familiar test apparatus. In a second experiment socially-reared rats and isolation-reared rats were food and water deprived. Again, no differences in consumption were found. In a third experiment socially reared and isolation-reared rats were allowed to consume sucrose presented in either an ascending or descending order of concentration. When given sucrose in an ascending order of presentation isolation-reared rats consumed significantly more sucrose than socially reared rats. This suggests that isolation-rearing increased the effects of positive contrast, and is consistent with other observations of increased incentive motivation in isolates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00116-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social isolation increases indices of approach motivation, including enhanced responding for increasing sucrose concentrations and greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli.

    “Increased indices of approach motivation are also found following social isolation, with evidence of enhanced responding for increasing concentrations of sucrose (Cuenya et al., 2015; Hall et al., 1997), as well as greater conditioned responses to sucrose-related stimuli (Jones et al., 1990).”

    From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Hall et al., 1997

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 54

Authors
HALL, F., HUMBY, T., WILKINSON, L., & ROBBINS, T.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
HALL, F
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
291-297
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142972276
Cited by
54
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institutes of Health (5f31da005408-02)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 05408)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
social isolation, isolation rearing, sucrose intake, incentive motivation, positive contrast, food and water deprivation, weanling rats, social rearing
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Food Deprivation, Lighting, Male, Reward, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Sucrose, Water Deprivation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review