Cited by 365Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Chronic stress in dogs subjected to social and spatial restriction. I. Behavioral responses

Beerda, Bonne, Schilder, Matthijs B.H, Van Hooff, JAN A.R.A.M, De Vries, Hans W, Mol, Jan A·1999·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Six weeks of social and spatial restriction were used as a model to induce chronic stress in Beagles. Behavioral and physiological measurements were performed during a period of enriched spacious outdoor housing in groups (GH) and during a subsequent period of solitary housing in small indoor kennels (IH). Behavioral parameters that may indicate chronic stress in dogs are reported. During IH, the dogs showed significantly (comparison-wise error rate <0.05) lower postures than during GH. IH induced enduring increments in frequencies of autogrooming, paw lifting, and vocalizing, and was associated with incidents of coprophagy and repetitive behavior. So far, we interpret the behavioral changes as signs of chronic stress. Relatively low levels of walking, digging, intentions to change from one state of locomotion to another, and increments in circling are conceived as obvious adaptations to the specific features of the IH system. By challenging the dogs outside their home kennel we tested whether the dogs' coping abilities were affected by IH. Dogs that were challenged were introduced into a novel environment, given the opportunity to escape from their home kennel, restrained, walked down an unfamiliar corridor, presented a novel object, exposed to loud noise, given food, or confronted with a conspecific. During IH, challenged dogs exhibited higher postures, showed more tail wagging, nosing, circling, urinating, and defecating, and changed more often from one state of locomotion…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00289-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronic stress-related behaviours, including increased aggression, excitement, uncertainty, paw lifting, vocalizations, repetitive behaviours, circling, self-licking, panting, and holding the head up during rest, may manifest over time in shelter dogs.

    “Chronic stress-related behaviours, including increased aggression, excitement, uncertainty, paw lifting, vocalizations, repetitive behaviours, circling, self-licking, panting, and holding the head up during rest, may manifest over time [177,178,179,180].”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [178]

  • Within shelters, dogs are exposed to environmental stressors such as noise, novelty, unpredictability, confinement for extended periods, and minimal human interactions.

    “Within shelters, dogs are exposed to a variety of environmental stressors such as noise (2), novelty, unpredictability, confinement for extended periods (3), and minimal human interactions (4).”
  • Prolonged and chronic exposure to shelter stressors may lead to behavioral changes such as the development of excessive arousal.

    “Due to prolonged and chronic exposure to these stressors, behavioral changes may be observed, such as the development of excessive arousal (3, 6–9).”
  • An ethogram of arousal- and fear-related, and general in-kennel behavior was used to guide behavioral observations, developed based on prior research.

    “An ethogram of arousal- and fear-related, and general in-kennel behavior was used to guide behavioral observations (Table 2). The ethogram was developed based on prior research on shelter dog in-kennel behavior, including behaviors associated with excessive arousal (e.g., jumping, mouthing, locomotion, vocalizations, alert, environmental scanning) (13, 35), stress (e.g., yawning, panting, reduced”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beerda, B., Schilder, M. B. H., Van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., De Vries, H. W., & Mol, J. A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Schilder, Matthijs B.H
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
233-242
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101811941
Cited by
365
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
chronic stress, dogs, social restrictions, spatial constraints, group housing, autogrooming, coprophagy, repetitive behavior, coping styles, aggression, sex differences, weather effects, beagle dogs, locomotor activity, vocalizations, tail wagging, circling behavior, stress physiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Chronic Disease, Dogs, Environment, Female, Male, Sex Characteristics, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Weather

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review