Cited by 108biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer composites and self-healing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Studies on syntheses and physical characterization of biodegradable aliphatic poly(butylene succinate-co-ɛ-caprolactone)s

Cao, A·2002·Polymer

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00658-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cao, A.
Venue
Polymer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
671-679
ISSN
0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021643094
Cited by
108
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
biodegradable copolyesters, aliphatic polyesters, polycondensation, diphenylphosphinic acid, stannous octoate, random copolymerization, thermal properties, crystal structure, mechanical properties, fracture elongation, biodegradation, compost soil, chain flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review