Cited by 64High Altitude and HypoxiaPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Increased fiber capillarization in flight muscle of finch at altitude

Mathieu-Costello, O., Agey, P.J., Wu, L., Szewczak, J.M., MacMillen, R.E.·1998·Respiration Physiology

Abstract

We examined fiber capillarization and ultrastructure in the highly aerobic flight muscle of six gray crowned rosy finches (Leucosticte arctoa; mass 22.9 +/- 0.5 (SE) g) living at altitude (A; White Mountains of Eastern California; 4000 m) compared to eight sea-level (SL) house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus, mass, 19.8 +/- 0.6 g) of the same subfamily, Carduelinae. Capillary length per fiber volume (A, 10,400 +/- 409 mm(-2); SL, 7513 +/- 423; P < 0.001) and capillary-to-fiber ratio (A, 2.32 +/- 0.07; SL, 1.85 +/- 0.06; P < 0.001) were significantly greater in A, with no difference in fiber cross-sectional area compared to SL. Capillary geometry was significantly different in A, yielding a greater contribution of tortuosity and branching to capillary length than in SL. Capillary-to-fiber surface ratio and fiber mitochondrial volume were both greater in A, but their ratio was similar to SL, indicating a proportional increase in the size of the capillary to fiber interface and fiber mitochondrial volume in A to sustain high levels of aerobic capacity while living at altitude.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0034-5687(97)00119-9

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muscle capillary-per-fiber number is higher for birds at high elevations in both highly aerobic pectoral muscles and less aerobic leg muscles.

    “Specifically, muscle capillary-per-fiber number is higher for birds at high elevations in both highly aerobic pectoral muscles and less aerobic leg muscles (Hepple et al., 1998;Mathieu-Costello et al., 1998).”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Mathieu-Costello et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathieu-Costello, O., Agey, P. J., Wu, L., Szewczak, J. M., & MacMillen, R. E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Mathieu-Costello, O.
Venue
Respiration Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-02
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
189-199
ISSN
0034-5687 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076948141
Cited by
64
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respiration Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL017731, 5PO1 HL 17731)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
flight muscle, altitude, house finch, Carpodacus mexicanus, capillary geometry, capillary-to-fiber ratio, mitochondrial volume, cardiorespiratory fitness, capillary tortuosity, capillary branching
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Altitude, Animals, Birds, Capillaries, Female, Flight, Animal, Male, Mitochondria, Muscle, Oxygen Consumption, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review