The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rural and urban differences in diabetes prevalence in Tanzania: the role of obesity, physical inactivity and urban living
Abstract
A population-based survey in 1996 and 1997 of 770 adults (aged > or = 15 years) from an urban district of Dares Salaam and 928 from a village in rural Kilimanjaro district (Tanzania) revealed that the prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), overweight, obesity, and physical inactivity was higher in the urban area for men and women. The difference between urban and rural prevalence of diabetes was 3.8 [1x1-6.5]% for men and 2x9 [0x8-4.9]% for women. For IFG, the difference was 2x8 [0x3-5x3]% for men and 3x9 [1x4-6x4]% for women; for overweight and obesity, the difference was 21.5 [15.8-27.1]% and 6.2 [3x5-8.9]% for men and 17x4 [11.5-23.3]% and 12.7 [8x5-16x8]% for women, respectively. The difference in prevalence of physical inactivity was 12x5 [7.0-18.3]% for men and 37.6 [31x9-43.3]% for women. For men with diabetes, the odds for being overweight, obese and having a large waist:hip ratio were 14.1, 5.3 and 12.5, respectively; for women the corresponding values were 9x0, 10x5 and 2x4 (the last not significant) with an attributable fraction for overweight between 64% and 69%. We conclude that diabetes prevalence is higher in the urban Tanzanian community and that this can be explained by differences in the prevalence of overweight. The avoidance of obesity in the adult population is likely to prevent increases in diabetes incidence in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Helmrich, S. P., Ragland, D. R., Leung, R. W., & Paffenbarger, R. S. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107183250302 · Cited by 1,634
Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.
Greenland, S., & Drescher, K. (1993) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532206 · Cited by 565
Cited by
Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., & King, H. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 · Cited by 15,297
Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 · Cited by 7,216
Hall, V., Thomsen, R. W., Henriksen, O., & Lohse, N. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-564 · Cited by 624
Mamo, Y., Bekele, F., Nigussie, T., & Zewudie, A. (2019) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-019-0421-0 · Cited by 147
Kolling, M., Winkley, K., & von Deden, M. (2010) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/1744-8603-6-8 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- ASPRAY, T.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 637-644
- ISSN
- 0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118692921
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rural and urban differences in diabetes prevalence in Tanzania: the role of obesity, physical inactivity and urban living. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90216-5
- The paper
- ASPRAY, T. (2000). Rural and urban differences in diabetes prevalence in Tanzania: the role of obesity, physical inactivity and urban living. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90216-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.